• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    The weird thing is that it had low quality settings to make less powerful pcs be able to run it.

  • ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 days ago

    The joke is i don’t think any “future pcs” can run crysis now since it’s not compatible with new windows versions iirc. I got a cobwebbed copy i can’t play in my steam library rn

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      People complain about it because modern games run horribly compared to older games and don’t look any better. Modern games really are unoptimized.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Gamers back then were crying about it being unoptimized back then too. There is no care about what the game accomplishes, only that it has to run perfectly smooth on their hardware.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    What’s the point in making a game that only works well in the future where other games look better or you stopped caring? I never played crisis then and I tried it recently and it felt outdated and cheap so I put it down

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      It worked well, it just had the capacity to upscale when the tech made it.

      Like having one car and owning a two car garage, it doesnt not work but it does give you options.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    12 days ago

    So poorly optimised you need future technology to run it isn’t the future proofing strategy I’d go with, but ok…