TLDR if you don’t wanna watch the whole thing: Benaminute (the Youtuber here) creates a fresh YouTube account and watches all recommended shorts without skipping. They repeat this 5 times, where they change their location to a random city in the US.

Below is the number of shorts after which alt-right content was recommended. Left wing/liberal content was never recommended first.

  1. Houston: 88 shorts
  2. Chicago: 98 shorts
  3. Atlanta: 109 shorts
  4. NYC: 247 shorts
  5. San Fransisco: never (Benaminute stopped after 250 shorts)

There however, was a certain pattern to this. First, non-political shorts were recommended. After that, AI Jesus shorts started to be recommended (with either AI Jesus talking to you, or an AI narrator narrating verses from the Bible). After this, non-political shorts by alt-right personalities (Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, Ben Shapiro, etc.) started to be recommended. Finally, explicitly alt-right shorts started to be recommended.

What I personally found both disturbing and kinda hilarious was in the case of Chicago. The non-political content in the beginning was a lot of Gen Alpha brainrot. Benaminute said that this seemed to be the norm for Chicago, as they had observed this in another similar experiment (which dealt with long-form content instead of shorts). After some shorts, there came a short where AI Gru (the main character from Despicable Me) was telling you to vote for Trump. He was going on about how voting for “Kamilia” would lose you “10000 rizz”, and how voting for Trump would get you “1 million rizz”.

In the end, Benaminute along with Miniminuteman propose a hypothesis trying to explain this phenomenon. They propose that alt-right content might be inciting more emotion, thus ranking high up in the algorithm. They say the algorithm isn’t necessarily left wing or right wing, but that alt-right wingers have understood the methodology of how to capture and grow their audience better.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Does this mean youtube preferentially selects alt-right shorts, or alt-right people make more shorts? Or some other thing entirely? Jump to your own conclusion.

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There’s a firefox extension to hide short and another to default to your subscription. Along with ublock, those are the only things that makes youtube usable.

    • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That doesn’t fix the out-of-the-box experience of the platform for millions, if not billions of people. Yes it’s a good step to take individually, but insufficient to deal with the broader issue raised of latent alt-right propagandizing

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    So you’re saying we need to start pumping out low quality left wing brainrot?

    • eronth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Insanely, that seems to be the play. Not logic or reason, but brainrot and low blows. Which is a bit at odds with the actual desire.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      It only must be extremely simplified and evoke emotional reactions. That’s just basic propaganda rules. The brainrot quality of the content is a consequence of the sheer quantity of the content. You can’t make that volume of content and without making fully automated ai slop.

      What the experiment overlooks is that there are PR companies being paid to flood YouTube with rightwing content and are actively trying to game its algorithm. There simply isn’t a left-wing with the capital to manufacture that much content. No soros-bucks for ai minions in keffiyehs talking about medicare.

  • danciestlobster@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t think it makes me feel better to know that our descent into fascism is because gru promised 1MM rizz for it

  • HoMaster@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    Alt right videos are made to elicit outrage, hate, and shock which our lizard brains react to more due to potential danger than positive videos spreading unity and love. It’s all about getting as many eyeballs on the video to make money and thi is the way that’s most effective.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There’s also an entire industry around mass producing this content and deliberately gaming the algorithm.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Are people making clickbait/ragebait articles about climate change? Are people seeking out clickbait about climate change?

        I don’t need to be constantly reminded of climate change, but an old “friend” is constantly telling me about the politics of video games he doesn’t even have a system to play with.

      • deus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        All alt-right content is made to generate outrage but content that generates outrage does not have to be necessarily alt-right.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Another important part of alt right bullshit is that they blame people that viewers can easily identify on the streets. Crime? It’s the immigrants and blacks! Shit economy? Jews and the deep state!

          So, I guess the only way to fight climate change is by accusing every petrol CEO of being a deep state Jew gay communist

      • Saltycracker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I feel like they have a hard time defining alt right. If you type in is drinking coffee alt right there is a article, playing video games, driving cars.

  • socialmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I realized a while back that social media is trying to radicalize everyone and it might not even be entirely the oligarchs that control its fault.

    The algorithm was written with one thing in mind: maximizing engagement time. The longer you stay on the page, the more ads you watch, the more money they make.

    This is pervasive and even if educated adults tune it out, there is always children, who get Mr. Beast and thousands of others trying to trick them into like, subscribe and follow.

    This is something governments should be looking at how to control. Propaganda created for the sole purpose of making money is still propaganda. I think at this point that sites feeding content that use an algorithm to personalize feeds for each user are all compromised.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      This discussion existed before computers. Before that it was TV and before that it was radio. The core problem is ads. They ruined the internet, TV, radio, the press. Probably stone tablets somehow. Fuck ads.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      The problem is education. It’s a fools game to try and control human nature which is the commodification of all and you will always have commercials and propaganda

      What is in our means is to strengthen education on how to think critically and understanding your environment. This is where we have failed and I’ll argue there are people actively destroying this for their own gain.

      Educated people are dangerous people.

      It’s not 1984. It’s Brave New World. Aldous Huxley was right.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I found youtube shorts very annoying, because I have an attention span and can focus on something for more than 30 seconds. But if you right-click the three dots on a few Shorts sections and click Not Interested, youtube gets the hint and stops offering them to you. Win-win!

    • Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I do that but every 30 days the short videos come back and then I have to click on the dots again. It’s not difficult but it’s kind of a dirty trick by YouTube. I look forward to something like peertube reaching critical mass. If YouTube continues to abuse their users, gets too spammy, gets too expensive with the paid tier, I think people will jump ship. Peertube isn’t ready for prime time yet.

    • tjt5754@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The problem is when channels you subscribe to pump out shorts. I use the Subscriptions page a lot and it has more and more become flooded with junk shorts that I don’t care about and don’t want to watch on my TV.

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Valid point but I would rather miss shorts from channels I subscribe to than see blurbs for all the endless others.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t seem to work for me, I also keep reporting ads and blocking ads, and they keep serving them up to me. So I have decided to disable YouTube on my phone.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I can no longer report ads on my phone.

        I kept reporting ads that were obvious scams(buy my book to get rich, this thing will make your PP hard and your girl squirt like a fountain, etc)

        Now I don’t get the three dots on ads.

        So I guess YouTube likes the scam ads?

        Do YouTubers like having AI narrated dick pill ads in front of their videos?

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting, I just scrolled through 10 or 15 pages of my youtube feed and there wasn’t a Short to be found. Maybe it takes some time to happen, I forget. Or you might have to click Not Interested more if you’ve already watched a lot of Shorts - I had only watched like 3. and they were accidental.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not really surprising that short video clips would be used to target people with lower critical-thinking skills and attention spans

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I keep getting recommendations for content like “this woke person got DESTROYED by logic” on YouTube. Even though I click “not interested”, and even “don’t recommend channel”, I keep getting the same channel, AND video recommendation(s). It’s pretty obvious bullshit.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think the explanation might be even simpler - right wing content is the lowest common denominator, and mindlessly watching every recommended short drives you downward in quality.

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I was gonna say this. There’s very little liberal or left leaning media being made and what there is is mostly made for a female or LGBTQ audience. Not saying that men cannot watch those but there’s not a lot of “testosterone” infused content with a liberal leaning, one of the reasons Trump won was this, so by sheer volume you’re bound to see more right leaning content. Especially if you are a cisgender male.

      Been considering creating content myself to at least stem the tide a little.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think some of it is liberal media is more artsy and creative, which is more difficult to just pump out. Creation if a lot more difficult than destruction.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Plus fact based videos require research, sourcing and editing.

          Emotional fiction only takes as long to create as a daydream.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Creation if a lot more difficult than destruction.

          Yup. A lesson that I fear we will be learning over and over and over in the coming years.

        • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not necessarily. For example a lot of “manosphere” guys have taken a hold of philosophy,health and fitness topics, a liberal influencer can give a liberal view on these subjects. For example in philosophy, explain how Nietzsche was not just saying that you can do whatever the fuck you want, or how stoicism is actually a philosophy of tolerance not of superiority etc. there’s really a lot of space that can be covered.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Really? As someone who dislikeds both mainstream extremes (I consider myself libertarian), I see a lot more left-leaning content than right-leaning content. I wouldn’t be surprised if >75% of the content I watch comes from a left-leaning creator, nor because I seek it out, but because young people into tech tend to lean left, and I’m into tech.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      yeah i created a new youtube account in a container once and just watched all the popular/drama suggestions. that account turned into a shitstorm immediately

      these days i curate my youtube accounts making liberal use of Not interested/Do not recommend channel/Editing my history and even test watching in a container before watching it on my curated account

      this is just how “the algorithm” works. shovel more of what you watch in your face.

      the fact that they initially will give you right-wing, conspiracy fueled, populist, trash right off the bat is the concern

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Man that seems like a lot of work just to preserve a shitty logarithm that clearly isn’t working for you… Just get a third party app and watch without logging in

        • jimmy90@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          oddly enough it seems to be working, if i don’t login at all youtube just offers up the usual dross

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Oh no, I only watch videos from channels I subscribe to. Just not through YouTube. It’s very easy.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I refuse to watch those shit shorts; I think your theory has legs. Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be a way to turn them off.

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Was it a conspiracy in 2016? Was it a conspiracy that elon bought x to control the narrative? Was it a conspiracy that TikTok has avoided shutdown by glazing trump? Was it a conspiracy when zuck just changed the way they did moderation on Facebook and then showed up at trumps inauguration?

          Youtube cucks are the worst.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hate the double standards

    On a true crime video: “This PDF-File game ended himself after he was caught SAing this individual… Sorry Youtube forces me to talk like that or I might get demonetized” Flagged for discussing Suicide

    On PragerU: “The Transgender Agenda is full of rapists and freaks who will sexually assault your children, they are pedophiles who must be dealt with via final solution!” Completely fucking acceptable!

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Same happened to me (live in WA) but not only do I get pro-tyranny ads and Broprah (Rogan) shorts, I also get antivax propaganda.

    I always use the “show less of this” option or outright remove it from my feed. Seems better now.

      • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        True, but the comparison lies more in the fact that- according to her fanbase, she can seemingly do no wrong. They gobble up anything she says like a nest of hungry baby birds.

        I see Rogan’s army of dudebros as being no different, only less intelligent.