• TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Considering most music files are MP3, yes it’s still cared about. It’s easy and small.

    You don’t need lossless all the time.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      There are better lossy formats, like opus.

      But MP3 still has its place as it’s supported everywhere.

    • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly, sometimes you just wanna jam to some mp3’s out of an iPod like the good ol days. It’s about the ✨vibes✨

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Most music files may be MP3s, but music files are rare these days. I wouldn’t be surprised if most people under 30 have never interacted with a music file at all, they just use streaming services.

      • Remavas@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I am under 30, and I have interacted with music files.

        edit: I don’t know about where you live, but I am definitely not the exception.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Funnily enough the guy who invented MP3 earned enough from royalties to barely afford a regular house in Germany. Meanwhile Apple made billions and rose like a phoenix from the ashes thanks to Apple Music and the iPod that rely on this format.

  • thechaoticchicken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sounds fine at good bitrates, universally supported, small, efficient, everywhere.

    Yeah, MP3 is just fine. Found zero reason to use any other format. And of course, while the rest of the world streams everything I’ll be happily using my massive MP3 library I can fit on a tiny little storage device and take everywhere I go without the need for the interbutts and big brother keeping tabs of what I listen to.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I used to think this but the convenience won out. Now over holiday break, my teen discovered my crate of CDs that he doesn’t remember seeing in his lifetime!

      And now I need to decide whether to buy a CD or DVD player to transfer to a more usable format - the last one I had was an old Xbox that is no longer with us

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah my car plays the 11,000 MP3s from a SDcard inside the armrest compartment.

      • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I read the manual for my cars radio. It has a max file size limit of like 256 songs or so per folder. But it can also accept 256 folders.

        So if your cars is anything like mine you can probably play your songs just by splitting them up into more folders.

        • NullPointer@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          no such luck for me there. the music is in /artist/album directories. I had considered flattening it all out to see if that makes a difference.

      • dan1101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The randomizing n my Focus ST is good, but when I tell it to shuffle play it always starts with 1 of 2 different songs, every time.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah WTF is up with that? My car does the same thing with a USB drive full of songs. It will literally play the same “shuffled” sequence over and over every time you drive. I have to take out the drive and change the files on it sometimes to make it actually Shuffle the songs’ order and that’s too much BS

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I am very slightly annoyed that people haven’t moved onto Opus which gives you better compression and quality than MP3. MP3s are still useful for any older devices that have hardware decoding like radio sets, handheld players, etc. Otherwise, every modern device should support Opus out of box.

    Hilariously, x264 has the same problem where there are direct upgrades with H.265 and AV1, but the usage is still low due to lack of hardware accelerated encoding (especially AV1), but like everyone uses FLAC for the audio which is lossless lol.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think SW Republic Commando sounds were stored in Vorbis. Back then.

      I use Opus when I rip something. It’s been a long time since the last case. I’ve left FreeBSD for Linux and returned back to Linux FreeBSD again since then.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Podcasts are almost exclusively mp3. There is no need for lossless fidelity on those. And when you are subscribed to 200 podcasts like I am a small file size matters. And when listening at 2.5x speed lossless is a complete waste.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      All my podcasts appear to use the AAC spoken audio profile? It’s much smaller and cleaner than MPEG layer 3 audio.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 month ago

        Apple broke metadata compatibility with a recent update. The podcast producer I know with an explicit AAC feed decided to just redirect to the MP3 feed. Unrelated to that, they also increased the MP3 bitrate for better audio quality. The increased file size doesn’t really matter that much compared to 15 years ago and people without unlimited data can just set their automated syncs to WiFi only.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have thousands of mp3s so I’d say they still matter. As far as audio quality goes I doubt my ears, at least at my age, can tell the difference between them and a lossless format.

    • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Anyone telling you they can hear the difference between a 320kbps MP3 and lossless audio is full of shit, anyway. It’s still a great format for keeping file sizes small, though I prefer ogg these days.

      • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m in the same boat: can’t hear any difference.

        But, I have GBs of 320k MP3s… is it worth converting to Ogg ?

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Opus is better than MP3 in every way. File size is either better or the same, and audio is better even at lower bitrates. But realistically, most streaming services don’t provide HD audio, so it really doesn’t even matter.

    249 webm  audio only      21.58MiB  49k https │ audio only         opus        49k 48k low, webm_dash
    250 webm  audio only      22.09MiB  65k https │ audio only         opus        65k 48k low, webm_dash
    251 webm  audio only      24.14MiB 128k https │ audio only         opus       128k 48k medium, webm_dash
    233 mp4   audio only        │                 m3u8  │ audio only         unknown             Default
    234 mp4   audio only        │                 m3u8  │ audio only         unknown             Default
    140 m4a   audio only      24.20MiB 130k https │ audio only         mp4a.40.2  130k 44k medium, m4a_dash
    

    This is YouTube music, which generally serves the split audio from a YouTube video as a song. Most of them I checked either don’t have audio above 130Kbps or don’t even provide MP3/Opus anyways.

    • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Youtube Music doesn’t just serve the audio from a video. They do serve the audio from a video if nothing else is available, but they also get releases directly from the publishers/distributors.

      The difference in sound quality is definetly noticeable.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Youtube Music doesn’t just serve the audio from a video.

        Yes it does. You don’t even need to take my word for it. Look up any song by any artist and find their official video for that song. Take this one as an example: https://youtu.be/kPa7bsKwL-c

        Analyze it with yt-dlp or something similar;

        249 webm  audio only      21.51MiB    50k https │ audio only           opus        50k 48k low, webm_dash
        250 webm  audio only      22.00MiB    67k https │ audio only           opus        67k 48k low, webm_dash
        251 webm  audio only      23.92MiB   130k https │ audio only           opus       130k 48k medium, webm_dash
        233 mp4   audio only        │                   m3u8  │ audio only           unknown             Default
        234 mp4   audio only        │                   m3u8  │ audio only           unknown             Default
        140 m4a   audio only      23.90MiB   129k https │ audio only           mp4a.40.2  129k 44k medium, m4a_dash
        

        YouTube already has access to the audio for that song without any additional effort because of how YouTube works. I’m sure publishers can provide higher quality audio, up to 256Kbps but that option isn’t even enabled for users by default. By default you’re listening to “normal” audio or 130Kbps: https://i.xno.dev/Ow2eC.png

        The reason why YouTube Music works is because they already have access to a huge library of music through music videos and the like. They save a ton of time and money by doing things this way and it makes perfect sense that they do…

        • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          As I said, some of the music is just the audio of a video, but they also get a lot of releases directly from the publishers. They are both on YT Music and the difference in quality in between them is noticeable.

          I have my audio quality set to high in that options menu btw.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s less supported, and for me mp3 is largely enough. Can fit a lot of them on my 20€ 128GB usb key…

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, I’m sure that it is less supported, but in all the years I’ve been using it I haven’t found one. 🤷‍♂️

  • Eyedust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I 100% do. I think mp3 is a good compromise of sound and space. It’s also the format I’m used to. Just like how people swear by physical record. If I’m at a get together and hear mp3 quality, I’m at home.

    That being said, I have my absolute favorites in flac for my iPod 5th gen video I rebuilt. The 5th gen’s dac, Wolfson, is a solid little dac for the day and age. Got Rockbox loaded up and I’m ace, but I’ve hard saved all the Apple firmware for every model in case the time came to sell them. Old iPods could be an investment someday and I own every gen in multiples.

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s still my preferred format. Everything can play it. At 256kbit or better it sounds fine for usual listening.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sure, it’s like JPG.

    It may not be the newest or best compression ratio, but it works, and even the shittiest old hardware supports it. And I know it won’t whine about licences being missing or some shit.

  • muhyb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Well, most of my music collection lies as mp3. I care about metadata and all of them have tags. I would love to convert my collection to opus but first I need FLACs and an easy way to move over metadata, since vorbis is different than ID3tag. Do you know a streamlined way for this?

      • aceshigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mhmm I haven’t heard of the first two. I still listen to mp3s that I got from the 90s.

        • IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You might not have heard of the formats but you’ve definitely listened to them. For example, Youtube has only served audio in aac and opus for years now. Most instant messaging apps also use opus during calls to reduce bandwidth usage. And those are just some big examples. Basically almost any online service has dumped mp3 in favor of aac and opus since they’re better in every way (in the sense that they have better quality at the same bitrate as mp3, so you can reduce the filesize by a lot and still preserve the same audio quality)

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have boatloads of MP3s and at least they can pretty much be played by all imaginable software and hardware imaginable, and since the patents have expired, there’s no reason not to support the format.

    MP3s are good enough for its particular use case. Of course, newer formats are better overall and may be better suited for some applications. (Me, I’ve been an Ogg Vorbis fan for ages now. Haven’t ripped a CD in a while but should probably check out this newfangled Opus thing when I do.)

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I listen to mp3 all the time. Back in the Napster days I collected a ton of music, but moreover I’m a fan of Old Time Radio from the 30s and 40s, so I accumulated around 10,000 of those shows. More than I’ll ever have time to listen to. Audiophiles may deride the quality level, but I don’t believe in letting perfection be the enemy of good. And even if “computers” - whatever that even means anymore lol - drop support for mp3, there will always be software that plays it as long as there are people with big collections of files they don’t want to take the trouble to convert to something else.