Even if it landed correctly, why would they plan a solar powered mission to the moon when our next lunar eclipse is in like 5 days?

      • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, and eggs have weight.

        So they couldn’t use eggs as a power supply.

        Therefore, the only alternative was to rely entirely on solar.

        • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Meanwhile, they now have nuclear diamond batteries. Hell, the Voyagers have been running on aging plutonium for nearly 50 years.

          You’d figure a modern expensive system like that might have a modern secondary power source, at least enough juice to run for two weeks FFS…

          • Voyajer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Because for the amount of power needed they would have to halve its payload capacity if they used RTGs

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Quite true. Strangely, here on Earth they have smart robots that you can literally kick over sideways, and their sensors and hydraulics and stuff kick right in and set them back upright.

      If you’re gonna dump hundreds of millions of dollars into such a project, why not utilize all known, available, and proven technology?

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    How would a secondary power source save it from being tipped over? That’s a mission ending failure no matter how many redundant power sources you have.

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Being tipped over doesn’t inherently stop all of its equipment from working, I’m sure at least some of the sensors could otherwise still work, if they had power.

      Even if only 10% of the sensors and equipment could still work, 10% would still be better than 0%.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        True, but communication could still be a problem.

        Generally this kind of probe will have a highly directional antenna that has pretty strict limits on it’s aim. We would have to be very lucky for the antenna to not get damaged during the fall and end up in a position where it can still establish a connection. Even if all the science is fine, it’s as good as useless if it can’t communicate any results or accept commands.

        • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ah, but it did send data back before the battery ran down, at least enough data to confirm it fell over when it landed.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s all about weight when going to space. It’s one of the basic parts of rocket science. If you want to send 1 pound into space, you need to add gas to cover that weight, and the weight of the gas you add. Eventually you reach a point where the combined weight of the gas is more than the thrust it provides and you can’t add more. Solar is light, a few hours of no power isn’t a big deal over months or years of operation time, if you are confident things will come back on when there’s light again.

  • lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Chief O’Brien would be so disappointed. he wouldn’t like to be caught without a secondary backup in a crunch.