Not my old ass over here cheering for functional coding… nope…
… but yep.
Love functional coding. Depending on the use case it works really well.
Wonder what return based is, sounds similar to functional.
Less of a paradigm but a way to write exploits but still more of a paradigm than vibe coding. It basically means “hey I can buffer overflow over the return address, let’s treat the program’s code as a VM to do what I want”.
Wow, I never even knew about ROP until today. I feel kind of silly 😅
This is interesting, but I don’t think I could find a genuine use-case for it.
We’ve seen functional programming, now get ready for dysfunctional programming
AKA whenever I write something in a strictly functional-only language and think I’m ready but I’m just way too used to object oriented to get it.
Isn’t that just unstructured programming?
Who’s they?
Teletubbies.
At first I thought “vibe-coding” was just writing code that felt useful at the time without having like design documents or a formal plan. Literally just coding based on vibes. And I thought it was nice that they finally recognized the way I have been writing code for the past ten years when all my bosses and managers haven’t.
Imagine my disappointment when it turned out to be what it actually is.
