• PushButton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wow, they are going to zip it with a different algo. That’s fucking amazing!

    Faster installation, I don’t know what I will do with all that extra time!

    Plus, faster downloads, that’s even more free time.

    Mozilla really know how to innovate.

    Best company evvvvaaarrr

      • intelisense@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, now you mention it, the motivation here may be to reduce their bandwidth costs? Probably not 2 million, but every € counts…

  • Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why do they not just ship normal packages (.deb, .rpm, etc.) or an official flatpak that functions properly?

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think the “etc” shows how f***ed up it might be to package for every single distro. Releasing a tar with no extra bloat and letting each community doing its own things over it is probably one of the best approaches?

      • Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        But it makes finding a properly functioning official package more difficult for newer users, and really the etc. was superfluous. You only really need .deb, .rpm, and whatever arch uses. There is a flatpak, but it doesn’t work properly.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think, you’ve answered your own question? There’s a lot of different formats for Linux. Getting them all correct and working on the different distributions is significantly trickier than just bundling a self-contained archive.

      Having said that, they do actually provide a DEB repo since a few months ago: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/install-firefox-linux#w_install-firefox-deb-package-for-debian-based-distributions-recommended

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Interesting, I always assumed they would be using a pretty optimal algorithm with their .tar.bz2 format, because they obviously benefit quite a bit from smaller downloads. Good to know that .tar.xz is actually better.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    What? More compression?

    Here I am wondering why in 2024 we don’t have the option to automatically decompress downloaded files like Apple users supposedly can.

    Ahh well, I guess that’s why these designers don’t work for apple. They’re not good enough.