• Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      It is the source most Americans get their news from wether it’s technically a news source in itself.

  • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Well, fuck us. there no way television news can be trusted and absolutely no way most social media sites can be trusted. How quickly the information age destroyed information.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah, I was going to say that TV wasn’t much of a news source to begin with. The real issue is that social media for news is probably worse - now everyone can be spoonfed the news they want.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    And that’s problematic as social media is harder to debunk due to how chronic bullshit flies.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Is it though. Are they gonna trust cousin Lenny more than the talking heads on a big TV show with production. Are you gonna sound more or less credible than cousin Lenny, now a big TV show with “experts”

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Bad news except you can’t trust TV either. Or reading the news, lately. At least regardless of the medium, general advice carries-- double check sources, learn which are credible, etc.

    I just hope people are following links and not just reading headlines, right? …Right?

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    I’m actually surprised that this is the first time that’s happened.

    America is not exactly known for having standard news programs as anyone in the rest of the world would consider them, it’s just a matter of picking your preferred bias.

  • count_dongulus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    At least with social media, you can choose what content to engage with or scroll past. A lot of TV news is fear mongering non-news entertainment. I don’t care that someone got arrested after a high speed chase. I don’t care about someone’s dog charity. What your local Sinclair is peddling, let alone Fox, is just about getting you to come back over and over for the ads, and it’s a continuous feed of trash someone else is deciding to put in your face and dub important.

    Feeds also often let you mark content as “not interested” to better personalize for what you consider relevant and newsworthy. So, it’s not necessarily a one-way street there either.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Okay, I’m gonna give you a tip if you’re interested in geopolitics and recent events: follow EvanWritesOnX. I don’t have any actual social media accounts but you can read his posts without having a Twitter one, and he certainly seems to have a very clear view of what’s happening. Take care!