• Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t know what’s the hate with edge, it works wonderfully for an average user, it’s fully configurable with add-ons and handles security policies really well

      The AI integration might be a bit over the top but nothing you can’t disable in your side

      Really I don’t see why you guys pile on so much on it

      • Vari@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because it’s my fucking computer and I shouldn’t have to edit the registry to uninstall a program I don’t use.

        After every update it’s also reset to my default browser which is infuriating

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        A lot of the hate comes from Microsoft forcing it down everyones throats.

        If it had been left to user choice, they may actually have a decent userbase; but instead it’s been forcefully installed on pretty much every windows computer regardless of the owners preferences, it repeatedly re-asserts itself as the default browser, some windows features are hard-coded to use it and break if its removed, there is no simple uninstall process, and windows update will re-install it if you manually remove it.

        It’s my damn computer; if I don’t want a piece of software, I should be able to remove it.

        Ditched Windows entirely 2 years ago partly because of that, partly because of the same upcoming behaviour with AI. Fuck Microshaft, I’ll take my money and attention elsewhere. (I was previously paying for/using pro licenses, for features like RDP hosting)

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Microsoft’s monopoly and their for-profit anti-consumer practices is what’s wrong with it. Their history says they cannot be trusted. I’d ask myself why they need a browser in the first place.

        • RaccoonBall@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yup. As someone who lived through the internet explorer dark ages, I’m not eager for google and or Microsoft to have complete dominance

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Edge is a fine browser. I use it when Firefox isn’t working for a particular reason.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    nobody was expecting linux users sucking eachothers cocks in the comment section

  • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you’re on windows this means you don’t own the file. Go to properties security and take ownership.

    The default windows configuration is aimed at old people who will call tech support when they fuck up their PC.

    You can take ownership of pretty much the entire filesystem.

    Windows is actually hugely customizable people just don’t.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    My work laptop had a pop-up from an application that basically said “we couldn’t restart last time, so you e got 15 minutes until we reboot your computer” with no way to cancel or prevent the reboot.

    Me: the fuck you are

    * proceeds to kill the service and process from admin command line*

    Get fucked fortinet, I’ll reboot when I’m gods damned ready

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    had a friend that was having problems with his PC and windows kept bitching about he didn’t have permissions. he ripped out the harddrive with it still powered on and threw it off his balcony into the lake screaming, “I fucking own you!”

    epic moment in my life to witness such an event.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Is there a technical reason that Linux apps can’t/don’t just pop up an authenticator thing asking for more privileges like Windows apps can do? Why does nano just say that the file is unwriteable instead of letting me increase the privileges?

    • Mohamed@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Some do. I’m sure it is possible with terminal programs. In KDE, you do get authenticator pop-ups.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        With arch+xfce4 I mostly don’t. Except for when I do systemctl reload <service> in a cli without sudo and it pops a surprise elevation password request gui in my face. I haven’t figured out what makes it behave like that.

        I use Arch btw 👉🧐 eats booger

        • m0stlyharmless@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          That’s the result of polkit (policy kit) authentication agents. These are typically DE-specific for their GUIs.

          pkexec is comparable to sudo and can be used from the terminal to get the graphical prompt for elevated commands.

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, when I was on xfce on Arch I remember going into some places in the file manager where it wouldn’t let me edit files etc without running it from the terminal through sudo.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Hmm I just tried editing some systemd service with Kate and it did actually give me an authenticator popup when I tried to save it

        Although then the prompt expired and now it does nothing when I try to save it. Restarted Kate and now it works again…

        I haven’t tried that before

        When I try to go into the sudoers.d folder tho it just says I can’t, and the same thing happens when I try to open the sudoers file in Kate. If I try to copy and paste a systemd service in dolphin tho it just says I don’t have permission and doesn’t give a prompt.

        lol if I open it with nano through sudo it says ‘sudoers is meant to be read only’

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Iirc there are ways to format your command to get it to do this. So whatever app you’re using just chose to format its command the simpler way.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      You needed permission from the SYSTEM or TrustedInstaller account.

      Which you can give to yourself if you are admin.

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Last time I did that it didn’t work so I figured I will restart and it will recognize then. Windows got a 30 minute update.

        When I logged back in my account was gone and still asked for a password. My old password didn’t work.

        Recovery option also fucked my grub. (Probably just the EFI now that I think about it.)

        • naticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          That last bit about GRUB is why I never put Windows on the same drive as my Arch, btw install. If they both have their own EFI partitions, Windows doesn’t mess with Linux.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just because you have admin rights doesn’t mean the process you’ve invoked does. Unless you specifically elevate it or the process asks to elevate, it’ll run unprivileged.

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I own you!
    take ownership & full access of all resources
    threat actor exploits a vulnerable application that is (1) running as you to (2) access resources it doesn’t need: they commandeer your system

    how did that happen?

    🤔

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    EZ fix i learnt from hunter2

    chmod 777 -R /

    sudo ufw allow 22

    hunter2 ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ah ah ah! You didn’t say the magic word!

    sudo edit the file!

    Ah ah ah! You didn’t say the secret word right after!