• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ludicrous amounts of money being pumped into a technology that has no practical purpose.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I wouldn’t go that far, both LLMs and other ML technologies clearly have novel use cases (unlike crypto where the only use cases are financial speculation and crime).

      The issue is that AI promoters/conmen are knowingly misrepresenting the capabilities of their services to benefit from pump and dumps (case in point Microsoft and OpenAI agreeing to define AGI as any service that gets $100 B in annual revenue).

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re novelties for sure, but I see nothing but toy uses or things that be achieved by other, less wasteful, techniques.

        I assume by crypto you mean cryptocurrencies rather than any cryptography, because there’s lots of valid uses for private communication.

        • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes, I didn’t mean cryptography of course. :)

          There are some very useful use cases. One that I have a decent amount of experience in is upscaling SD (or even VHS) content. Depending on the quality of the source material, you can get very good results.

          I’ve also found LLMs helpful as a compliment to web searching for my work (I deal with lots of public datasets from international organisations); LLM queries have helped me find sources that I missed via directed search.

          It can also be helpful as guided learning/reference system for Linux CLI (I tend to forget the parts I rarely use) or even software application more broadly (used it to help learn about GIS applications that I needed to use to access historical weather data for a work project).

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            So “as a compliment to web search” is a great example. We had really good we search based off deterministic algorithms. Now we have enshittified web search, so you boost it with AI that was significantly more expensive to train, significantly more expensive to run inference on, and can confidently return false “facts”.

            We’re not using it because it’s better. We’re using it because the alternative got worse.

          • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I’ve also found LLMs helpful as a compliment to web searching for my work (I deal with lots of public datasets from international organisations); LLM queries have helped me find sources that I missed via directed search.

            Do consider that web search had been a computationally simple and more importantly solved problem that has gotten steadily more unsolved over the course of the past 25 years.

            • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              There is a lot of truth to that.

              Google web search (and by extension services like Ecosia that rely on Google) has worsened in quality, especially for more niche content that requires some work to get to.