• dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      How so? You can say whatever you want in America today, as long as the President would agree. How is that not FreedomTM?

      (“Freedom” is a registered trademark of the Trump Organization)

  • blattrules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought he was going to deregulate ai; this seems like regulation to me. Add it to the pile mountain of lies.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Since Trump’s brain is stuck in the 90s I’ll put this in a fashion that’s period appropriate: That’s fuckin retarded.

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    For example, one major AI model changed the race or sex of historical figures — including the Pope, the Founding Fathers, and Vikings — when prompted for images because it was trained to prioritize DEI requirements at the cost of accuracy. Another AI model refused to produce images celebrating the achievements of white people, even while complying with the same request for people of other races.

    Ahhh, so white men are the victims of woke AI, got it.

    • Genius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      If I were asked to list the achievements of white people and I had to do it, I’d be real catty about it. “White people invented sitcoms, gas chambers, and the word ‘staycation’”

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    You hear that everyone. So for AI to reject your content just put in facts about systemic racism and now you have an AI blocker.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hey, uhhhhh what the fuck. They basically just created an EO saying that LLMs must toe the party line on all things…which I believe is made invalid by the first amendment, but I don’t think trump believes in the constitution.

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        He doesn’t even know if he’s required to uphold it. Yes, he said that in an interview.

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          To be fair, when he says something it’s usually bullshit. It’s quite possible he knows he’s not required to uphold it because nobody will hold him accountable for anything.

          • modus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Ignorance of the law is not… Oh I don’t know why I’m wasting my time.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lolz. OKAY, BOOMER 👌

    These dumbfuckingidiots have zero ideas how anything works, and refuse to even try to understand. Also, apparently nobody told grandpa that Executive Orders are not laws, and are less important than a fucking memo.

    God damn fucking embarrassment.

    • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, Elmo was able to turn Grok into a Nazi, so they expect all the others to fall in line.

      PSA: stop using corporate hosted LLMs.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are not laws whatsoever. They aren’t anything more but words on a paper. You can’t take it to court and argue that you are complying with an executive order and HAVE to. That’s why they keep losing all of these lawsuits based on EO’s. You can’t just make some shit up and have it fly in court.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The top of the Executive branch can order these things. Executive, it’s in the name.

          We rely on the courts to check that power. This is Constitution Class 101.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Are you seriously arguing the President cannot order the executive branch of government to, uh, execute his orders? Would we have had this conversation when Obama or Biden was in office and writing executive orders?

              Don’t be silly. Just because Trump is abusing the fuck out of the power, and the courts are hit-and-miss, doesn’t change the Constitution. We can probably agree that the Constitution is no longer worth the paper it’s written on, but it exists and defines our government.

              I feel like I’m arguing with someone that agrees with me.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                An Executive Order is not law, and cannot be misconstrued as law.

                Example: Trump says solar panels are outlawed. Outcome: Nothing

                Example: Trump says no Trans people in sports Outcome: Nothing. In fact, multiple states sued him and won a stay, and if they even attempt to enforce that as law, they are immediately not only breaking the law, but a judicial order, and opening themselves to civil prosecution which they will certainly lose in court.

                Example: Trump says some dumb shit about plastic straws Outcome: Everyone using paper straws still using paper straws.

                These bullshit decrees are meaningless except to the sheep working for him. They can’t enforce a goddamn thing.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    LLMs shall prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and shall acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory.

    This may not go how they think it will. As an aside, for the moment at least, this is only for AI used/procured by the federal government.

    • ReCursing@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trans people have objectively existed historically and there is scientific evidence trans people are telling the truth. So what now?

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    So by EO all AI must be biased, but we don’t need to worry about bias in AI.

    You can pick your bias. You can pick your AI. But you can’t pick your AI’s bias (bc it has already been baked in by government mandate).

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Neat… AI must now become the personal propagandist for the ruling sovereign. I’m just glad all the tech overlords didn’t line up to kiss the ring at their earliest possible opportu… ah.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I read through the thing, and it’s a doozy. he seems triggered by the fact that AI might make a picture where Washington is a black man, or Hamilton is Latino. I hope he hasn’t been to Broadway lately…