You must log in or register to comment.
localghost is an amazing domain name
Message aside, the site is cool, love that you can change the style, and the icon animation on the last one is brilliant. Also: a webring! It’s been a long time since I saw one. I need more of this web and I’m happy to rediscover it.
WTF??? That’s amazing! Thank you for wasting my time -a lot of it- in the best possible way ;)
Its so damn snappy too!
Hosted at neocities. Wait GeoCities?? In no. Blah.
I read these websites because I’m also a human and I enjoy experiencing the ideas of my fellow humans first-hand, not filtered into a boring puree or boiled down essence. I have always enjoyed reading things written by actual humans, because I can connect intellectually and emotionally with the actual real live person behind the ideas, and learn and grow with them as they also do the same, and I expect that enjoyment will continue if not intensify in the coming years as AI buries such signals in ugly soulless noise.
There will always be an appetite for real human creation. The hard part will be reliably finding it. I will be relying heavily on my finely tuned bullshit detector to work as an AI detector for now, and I can only hope that it will be enough.
This reminds me of when the Internet was new, exciting, and full of promise for improving life for people and being a reliable way to bypass censorship and share the truth with the world.
Thank you for that.
As someone who’s been on the web since the 90s I hate this.
The web was designed to be user agent agnostic. Desktop, phone, fridge, ai agents, curl, python script - whatever agent you are using shouldn’t matter for access. That’s the whole point of open internet, period.
Open until your server is down because LLM are overloading it
At my company, we had to implement all sorts of WAF rules precisely for that reason. Those things are fucking aggressive.
Same. And just because page size is “low” doesn’t mean shit when they’re flooding requests. Try having public research data and watch how much your costs go up just due to load balancer throughput.
overloading from 200kb of html? We’re not in dialup era anymore
They did have a lot of concerns with abuse though and you can see that in the way the cookies debate went before they were supported in their current form. I think AI crawlers tanking bandwidths for websites and misusing the data they scrape would 100% be something the Mozilla from back then would’ve had concerns over allowing or encouraging.
You’re conflating two different issues. The topic is “for whom the web is for?” not banwidth distribution and optimization.
If LLM bot is being abusive then that’s no different from any other user agent behaving like this and we should expand these protections from intentional/unintentional ddos irrelevant of user agent.
I think your starting point (allowing bot user agents to crawl the web has overlooked benefits) is a good one, but things aren’t black and white–there are clear drawbacks, too. Bots obviously have an orders of magnitude higher potential for abuse; to the point where bot traffic–as it currently stands in the real world–is qualitatively different from human traffic.
we should expand these protections from intentional/unintentional ddos irrelevant of user agent.
Sure, but targeted regulation based on heuristics (in this case, user agent) is also a widely accepted practice. DUI laws exist, even though the goals (fewer murders and safer roads) are already separately regulated.
Would it be nice if we didn’t have to do this? Or there were some other solution? Sure, but I have no idea where to even start, unfortunately.
Instructions unclear, built whole site with nested tables.
Each one had better be in its own iframe.
This website is really pretty. Design goals
weird robots sounds “aargh…must…ignore…the rule.” sound of crashed robot “continue scrapping websites.” robot weird noise begin to continues “ignore robot.txt, ignore anti_ai_rules.txt, bypass cloudflare” robot sound getting weird and weirder as it getting deeper and deeper into website
haha tarpit goes brrr
https://localghost.dev/robots.txt
User-Agent: * Allow: /I share the author’s sentiments. Would rather people read my posts and form their own opinions, than offload their thinking to a machine (while consuming energy and water to do so). And the idea that my posts would be scraped and used to train an LLM against my wishes makes me a lot less motivated to publish personal blogs.
What does 11ty stand for, besides “eleventy”? I’m expecting something like a11y, where there are 11 characters in between.
Also, someone crash course me about the difference between 11ty and regular SSR?
deleted by creator
I like this
Wow, 8 whole paragraphs? Don’t worry guys ChatGPT’s got ur back 🔥😎🔥
The author criticises AI search tools like Google’s for repackaging human-created content—such as recipes—into bland, soulless summaries, depriving original creators of credit, personality, and traffic. They highlight “Google Zero,” a feared future when AI answers replace visits to real websites, threatening independent writers and the ecosystems built around them.
They stress that their website exists for human readers, not machines. Each article is crafted with care, personality, and lived experience, intended to spark thought, connection, and conversation—not to be scraped, flattened, or mimicked by corporate AI models.
Still too long, gimme the broad strokes here. I’m far too busy to interact with art, just gimme the facts.
Okay I drained another lake but I think this time I’ve got what you need;
- AI search recycles work into bland results.
- “Google Zero” may kill site traffic.
- Values human trust and personality.
- Humanity will be consumed all hail AI.
- Site is for people, not AI.
I don’t see how any of this is helping the shareholders
The shareholders have been notified. Please remain still and await The Event. The process is painless. All things serve The Beam.
