The Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to combine access to the sensitive and personal information of Americans into a single searchable system with the help of shady companies should terrify us – and should inspire us to fight back.

While couched in the benign language of eliminating government “data silos,” this plan runs roughshod over your privacy and security. It’s a throwback to the rightly mocked “Total Information Awareness” plans of the early 2000s that were, at least publicly, stopped after massive outcry from the public and from key members of Congress.

Under this order, ICE is trying to get access to the IRS and Medicaid records of millions of people, and is demanding data from local police. The administration is also making grabs for food stamp data from California and demanding voter registration data from at least nine states.

Much of the plan seems to rely on the data management firm Palantir, formerly based in Palo Alto. It’s telling that the Trump administration would entrust such a sensitive task to a company that has a shaky-at-best record on privacy and human rights.

Bad ideas for spending your taxpayer money never go away – they just hide for a few years and hope no one remembers. But we do. In the early 2000s, when the stated rationale was finding terrorists, the government proposed creating a single all-knowing interface into multiple databases and systems containing information about millions of people. Yet that plan was rightly abandoned after less than three years and millions of wasted taxpayer dollars, because of both privacy concerns and practical problems.

It certainly seems the Trump administration’s intention is to try once again to create a single, all-knowing way to access and use the personal information about everyone in America. Today, of course, the stated focus is on finding violent illegal immigrants and the plan initially only involves data about you held by the government, but the dystopian risks are the same.

Over fifty years ago, after the scandals surrounding Nixon’s “enemies list,” Watergate, and COINTELPRO, in which a President bent on staying in power misused government information to target his political enemies, Congress enacted laws to protect our data privacy. Those laws ensure that data about you collected for one purpose by the government can’t be misused for other purposes or disclosed to other government officials with an actual need. Also, they require the government to carefully secure the data it collects. While not perfect, these laws have served the twin goals of protecting our privacy and data security for many years.

Now the Trump regime is basically ignoring them, and this Congress is doing nothing to stand up for the laws it passed to protect us.

But many of us are pushing back. At the Electronic Frontier Foundation, where I’m executive director, we have sued over DOGE agents grabbing personal data from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, filed an amicus brief in a suit challenging ICE’s grab for taxpayer data, and co-authored another amicus brief challenging ICE’s grab for Medicaid data. We’re not done and we’re not alone.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Holy fuck. All of that will be stolen in 3 seconds and the minute it launches Russia will be granted special access. It was nice knowing ya’ll. Not really but. Yeah.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        You joke but they could open up lines of credit, loans, make big purchases in your name. Of course, all my shit is shot so good luck getting approved with mine. Either way at this scale you could infinitely fuck with Americans in kind of financially devastating ways.

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m really more concerned about what the US will do with it than what Russia might do with it.

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    The libertarian “don’t tread on me” wing of the Republican party is hilariously quiet.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      10 days ago

      That’s because their motto is “Tread on me harder, daddy” since 2016.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      The libertarian wing was never really very libertarian, they mostly didn’t care much about weed and wanted to actually cut spending (or at least claimed to).

      Look at Mike Lee (unfortunately my Senator) he calls himself a “libertarian” because he says no a lot, but he also toes the party line when it natters and hasn’t championed any social issues I’d call “libertarian.” I changed my registration to Republican just so I could vote against this clown twice in one election.

  • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 days ago

    Look on the bright side: this way, you don’t have to worry about data breach notification letters from all sorts of different companies or agencies since they’ll all be coming from the same source. Really saves on letterhead.

    • rigatti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I was told if I voted for a repeat of Genocide Joe’s team then we would get genocide or something. This is much better!

        • rigatti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          I respect the protests. Bring on more protests. It’s the whole not voting thing that I do no respect.

          • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Exactly. Protesting is an effective way to get your voice heard. But those that chose to withhold their vote only served to cut off the noses of others to spite an issue they know little about.

            SO many people are being hurt by their ignorant and selfish decision.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      It was always a projection. Sure as shit, if a party ever created a one-world-government it would be the conservatives.

  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s stupid from a comsec perspective even if it wasn’t stupid for any other reasons. Compartmentalization is a good strategy as we continue to upgrade outdated and vulnerable systems. But of course, this “leader” is an idiot. So he wouldn’t know that.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Exactly.

      I certainly agree with agencies having some amount of open access to their data, but only for things that are actually relevant. For example, the IRS should be able to check Social Security benefits to verify tax reports, but it shouldn’t see details like where their checks are being sent.

      If an agency needs access to data, they should specify exactly what they need and the source agency should provide an API to only get that into.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    Can someone EL5 me on how this is different from our data being stolen under the Patriot Act for the last two decades?

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Palantir creates platforms for data.

      This is creating a platform that allows somebody to access every piece of data in one centralized location.

      So example, when somebody is determining your social security payment (if that even exists in the future) they(or more likely AI) might be basing that decision not just on data relevant to income but also on something like a personal social credit score based on every piece of available government data related to a person over their entire lifetime.

      Did you get flagged as suspicious while flying bc of 9/11. Did something end up on your record by complete mistake? In this centralized data base you could have all kinds of real and incorrect details associated with you (or even other people like friends, family, neighbors, coworkers) used to discriminate against you. Data becomes destiny.

      Not to mention if they integrate it with these live facial recognition surveillance networks, something they caught you doing on camera without your knowledge could be used to make decisions.

  • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    and should inspire us to fight back.

    LOL. We won’t. US citizens have given up and those that haven’t don’t believe in anything but peaceful protests or trying to go about things “the right way”. Neither of which will do anything but hand over more control to billionaires and child rapists.

    • witten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Sounds like you’ve given up and are ready to roll over for Daddy Fascist. Might as well get yourself a MAGA hat to match.

      • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I’ve given up because I have tried rallying people and nobody wants to rally.

        Everyone just wants to peacefully protest, which I disagree with.

        Everyone wants to just wait until midterms, which is too late.

        Nobody, dems included, have any balls. It’s over.

        What the fuck have you done?

        • witten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          If nobody wants to rally behind your rallying cry, maybe try joining some existing organizations that have similar strategy and tactics as you. But just be aware that sometimes meeting those folks requires being active in adjacent spaces. You might need to put in the work to really get plugged in and involved.

          But there is a vast sea of resistance work happening between, on one end, peacefully waving cardboard signs at passing cars and, on the other side, armed revolution. I’ll give you some examples:

          • Meet with your local representatives and politicians and convince them to pass resolutions or legislation that put local roadblocks in the way of fascist incursions.
          • Look up vendors that supply or provide services to Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices and contact their customers, encouraging them to drop their contracts due to those vendors working with ICE.
          • Block entrances to ICE buildings to prevent kidnapped migrants from being transferred.
          • Follow and harass ICE vehicles so as to screw up their operational security.
          • Bang pots and pans outside hotels where ICE agents are known to be staying so that they can’t get any sleep.
          • Show up at immigration court cases in support of migrants.
          • Post long screeds on social media encouraging folks not to give up the fight.

          I’ve done some but not all of the above. You might consider doing the same.

          I agree that the people who are just twiddling their thumbs waiting for midterms are misguided, but so are the people who have given up six months into this regime. What I think isn’t misguided is trying to slow, delay, and generally gum up the works of everything this regime is trying to accomplish before the midterms. There are only so many months before then, so the more we can prevent them from damaging now, the better off we’ll be if and when we take back control. (I fully realize the prospect of even having midterms isn’t guaranteed, much less winning them.)

          • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            I really like your second bullet.

            A couple of the others, my only hesitation is that I am a naturalized, non-white citizen so I do sometimes have to balance the progress my actions will yield with being disappeared from the equation entirely. Thoughts?

            • witten@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Yeah, I think right now it’s probably smart to be cautious. I don’t know your particular situation or risk tolerance, but I gotta believe that there’s some type of resistance you’d be comfortable doing. I will say though that pretty much anything worth doing right now is going to be outside our comfort zone. And that applies to all of us.

              But even if you feel like there’s nothing you can do, you can support those who are in a better position to act.

              • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                Risk tolerance high, but blocking ICE entry a no-go because for me that’s just a visual fail and kind of a dumb move.

                Stealth disruption, great. Funding efforts, happy to. Provide arms, fine. Use of my own arms, sure.

  • blattrules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    We need to start saying they’re adding people who own guns as a table in that database and either get conservatives onboard with stopping it, or more likely just be able to call them hypocrites for one more thing.