• veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    14 days ago

    The obvious solution for these kinds of public entities is to spin up a mastodon instance to post their own alerts and updates that the public can subscribe to. That way the city is not beholden to someone else’s platform philosophy…if only everyone could agree to one social web protocol.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      Each city running its own? No, that’s way too much duplication of effort. Maybe have one run by the federal government, like the .gov domain.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        14 days ago

        If it’s unified under the federal government, then an asshole president can mess with it.

        If it’s distributed, with states and major cities having their own instances, then it’s more asshole-resistant.

        • mercano@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          14 days ago

          The city government spinning up its own instance makes sense. You could then have accounts for the various departments, transit, road and highway, parks and rec, the library, the mayor’s office…

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          “Asshole resistant” sounds like marketing terms used to advertise a dildo to a community that enjoys consentual non-consent.

          Like they want a dildo that doesn’t go into assholes easily.

      • veee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        14 days ago

        How about a state/province level instance for municipal affairs?

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Reasonable, but I think there would be more reliability and adoption if provided by the federal government. For example, I don’t really trust states like Alabama to run services like this properly.

          • fubo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            14 days ago

            I trust my city government a hell of a lot more than I trust the incoming federal administration.

            • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              I would trust a guy named Shank who sells fake IDs on the bus more than I trust the incoming federal administration.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                At least you know Shank is on your side. No ulterior motive working for the billionaire class. He’s just as fucked by the system as you are.

          • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            Why not all of the above? Each state can run their own and smaller cities and towns can use it. If larger cities want to host their own, then they can do that instead of relying on state instance.

          • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            14 days ago

            Attention the number 12 bus destination “banging your sister” is approaching the station. Roll tide.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      14 days ago

      I don’t think they realize how easy (and low risk) it can be to set up a Mastodon server. Particularly when you don’t have to allow the public to create accounts.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      Sounds great. I think it is super valuable to have an RSS feed so that people can subscribe in all sorts of ways. Having ActivityPub is also nice.

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    And here I am thinking at first glance they were talking about the band