They slowly started locking down the platform for people without accounts and it has been really annoying to use the website since. First it was not possible to search for code, then even searching for issues got more and more difficult with it randomly failing, and now it’s gotten to the point where I can’t search for a fucking project anymore!

Github’s search is becoming as bad as reddit’s, where if you want to find anything, a secondary service like SourceGraph, GrepApp, or even a dumb search engine is better. Sometimes those haven’t indexed what I need (especially code search), so I have to download the bloody tarball and rg for whatever the fuck it is I was looking for. Sometimes it will also block the VPN I’m using, so I have to proxy to a non-VPNed machine. The world could do without these unnecessary roadblocks.

What also grinds my gears is requiring an account to contribute. There is no way to send in a patch, raise an issue, or anything without an account there, so by if a project being on github, you have no choice but to give Microsoft your data to participate in opensource. Don’t get me wrong, mailing-lists are filth, but and I’d rather claw my eyes out than participate in any project demanding their use, but Microsoft being the “lesser evil” is not a good look.

Please, for the love of opensource, get your project off of github, please. It’s a monopoly at this point and doing microsoft things. This isn’t the end and they’ll probably do more stuff to see how far they can push it. We’ll all be the boiled frogs.

Yes, I know they have a CI and some other features, but if all you’re doing is hosting your code, please consider an alternative.

Possible alternatives in alphabetic order:

  • Codeberg (could have federation in the future)
  • Gitlab (has CI)
  • OneDev (no git SSH clone but feature-rich) not an instance for the public
  • Radicle (no CI, but federated)
  • Sourcehut (minimalist, but fast as fuck)

or maybe others will suggest more.

  • fxomt@lemm.eeEnglish
    87·
    2 days ago

    Codeberg is criminally underrated. The UI is great, it’s 100% open source, it has CI, and it will have federation in the future. It’s a shame more people don’t use it. Piefed/river and a bunch of cool niche projects are on it though :D

    The lemmy developers should seriously think of moving lemmy to codeberg, it’d be in line with lemmy’s anti-corporate stance.

    • kabi@lemm.ee
      43·
      2 days ago

      The choice every developer has to make is between having a potentially successful project, with contributors and community engagement, or hosting their stuff on an open platform. PeerTube even has a GitLab of their own, and yet they host their main software on GitHub, because they simply have to.

      • fxomt@lemm.eeEnglish
        29·
        2 days ago

        Yep, codeberg is great for personal/hobby or small projects, but beyond that it’s not ideal. The worst part is git is a decentralized protocol; yet github has centralized it, basically forcing developers to use it if they want their projects to live, or get a job. It’s a vicious cycle.

        But i still think developers should migrate to codeberg, if all of us just wait for codeberg to get big to use it, there’d be no users in the first place. Even if you put your project as a mirror, it’s still a step, or even better: vice versa, see river.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        2210·
        2 days ago

        That’s BS, if the software’s good people (i.e. devs) will find the source, unless all they do is spent their day on the github website.
        Most fine software i find is through social media and websites, i then proceed to checkout the code.

        • Kissaki@programming.devEnglish
          4·
          1 day ago

          You picked one concern of multiple: Code discoverability of an already known project.

          Multiple times I have found project sources on their own platforms, and when I would have contributed tickets or code, I did not because of requiring yet another account on yet another platform, with whatever yet unknown signup workflow.

          And there is man other concerns, some of which the comment you are replied to mentioned.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            22·
            1 day ago

            For yet another account i use a password manager and an email address i only use for crap. It’s a one time process.
            If that’s too much for you then perhaps you’re not that interested in contributing to <project>?

            • Kissaki@programming.devEnglish
              3·
              1 day ago

              Exactly. It’s a matter of barrier and interest. Signup requirements are a barrier to drive-by improvements and reports, and them as entry points to further contributions.

        • mesamune@lemmy.worldEnglish
          8·
          2 days ago

          I am seeing a LOT of the emulation crowd over at codeberg and other type of sites. Its gaining some popularity which is nice.

        • kabi@lemm.ee
          7·
          2 days ago

          I get that, and I even made an account on PeerTube’s GitLab just to submit a tiny fix on a secondary project of theirs, but do you think an average issue submitter would bother? I do not. And it’s not as simple as this process separating the wheat from the chaff, either.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      9·
      2 days ago

      I never sat foot on github, but moved from some shady place to Codeberg and it’s just fantastic. It just works.

      Only thing missing is some 5/10€ monthly plan where you get a golden leaf or something :-p

      On a more serious note, gotta check out how to support them in some meaningful way.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          4·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, figuring to go member, it’s only 24€ a year (FYI 12€ if you can’t shell out that sum) and this is one of the first projects that I’d really like to see take off.