Do you want me to go the speed limit? Because that’s how you get me to go the speed limit.

A fraction of your tax dollars went to finding and paying the employee who would ultimately create this image on the clock.

Actually makes me wonder what the 3d surface areas are relative to their 2d projected surface area.

Pac, yes. Biggie? Source?

Why did they use a pipe instead of the letter I?

| Don’t like it.

That is what aggregators served to defeat. Like Digg, reddit, or Lemmy. That’s what votes and “top hot trending” filters are all for.

Not saying the resolve the issue, just saying this is well known and understood

In both cases, it is decided by subject locality. Not object locality.

As I said.

It’s not physical distance.

“Here on earth, the air is made mostly of oxygen.”

“Here in the milky way Galaxy…”

It’s about locality to the subject.

I agree, I only include it as a “woah this WordPress stuff is confusing!” lower barrier to entry.

Try WordPress first. If they’re absolutely stuck, wix is a lot more beginner friendly. But yes, beware of the downsides to having your hand held.

Use WordPress. It’s by far the most used content management platform, so if you’re a beginner, you’ll find the most resources. It’s also free and open source.

Then you can, if you want to make it even easier, use a page builder like Elementor or Divi or something. Or not.

There’s also Wix for very simple page builds.

This is FALSE.

I remember I was once very sick, and I pooped. No pee.

I remember distinctly going ‘oh shit does that mean I’m dead?’

I would imagine a BMX bike in tow. Using bridge embankments to clear roads… 😎

Man, I don’t know. I wanna know too.

I got a refurb drive in 2019 that has been clicking and rumbling a little to moderately for 6 years now. Great value at this point, but it’s replacement is gathering dust…

Just gonna check ya asshole

Oooh, edgy. Few problems:

List of logical fallacies

1. Hasty Generalization

“Everybody privately shit-talks everybody.” Assumes a universal truth based on limited or anecdotal experience. Not everyone engages in this behavior

2. False Premise

“The phone always listens to it and records it.” This is factually untrue for most users and makes the argument invalid from the start. The conclusion based on this premise (a hack turning that into texts) relies on a false understanding of technology.

3. Slippery Slope (Implied)

“A viral hack that turns all this shit-talking into texts.”

Implied assumption: this will definitely go viral and cause massive disruption. It assumes a cascade of dramatic consequences without evidence.

4. Appeal to Cynicism

“Everybody privately shit-talks everybody.” Uses an exaggeratedly negative view of human nature as a foundation to justify or normalize antisocial behavior.

5. Moral Equivalence

By implying that since everyone does it, exposing it via a viral hack is just revealing the “truth” and therefore not really unethical, it downplays the maliciousness of the hypothetical hack.

Basically, your entire premise is a heap of logical fallacy and edgelord cringe.

It kinda might tell us something about power and influence.

Nah, it tells us about the people who seek out power and influence.

Oh my goodness you’re right, I was wrong. Thank you for correcting this meaningful distinction.

Chaos.

It kinda might tell us something about power and influence.

Anyone else keep those screenshots they accidentally take of their home screen because they know they’ll drunkenly accidentally delete an icon on their home screen and have no idea what icon is missing because they never use it but they e grown accustomed to it and want it back the way it was?

Just me?

Aaaaand you’re constipated.