Nemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoGoogle begins requiring JavaScript for Google Searchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1336arrow-down14
arrow-up1332arrow-down1external-linkGoogle begins requiring JavaScript for Google Searchtechcrunch.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-squareᴅᴜᴋᴇᴛʜᴏʀɪᴏɴ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down4·8 months agoSo, you’re saying Bing got better.
minus-squareMolecularCactus1324@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squaretb_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-28 months agoDDG does add their own spice on to – or so they claim, and Bing doesn’t have bangs so I’d never want to use it.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoPersonally I just use the better in-browser feature instead of bangs
minus-squaretb_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoFair. I could with Firefox, but I’m too lazy to configure all of that for myself.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoFortunately it takes like 2 minutes.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoIt’s not only the results, though, but other features too
So, you’re saying Bing got better.
deleted by creator
DDG does add their own spice on to – or so they claim, and Bing doesn’t have bangs so I’d never want to use it.
Personally I just use the better in-browser feature instead of bangs
Fair. I could with Firefox, but I’m too lazy to configure all of that for myself.
Fortunately it takes like 2 minutes.
But doesn’t work on mobile
It’s not only the results, though, but other features too