• Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    I wasnt going to get one anyway, but now I really won’t buy one lol.

    My current PC which at the time was a pretty much top of the line PC cost less than just that GPU. Ridiculous.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yup, my last build was 2020 when 2000 series was still the top. 2070s is what I went with. Complete with 64 GB of RAM, 3800X, and other stuff (even a 500$ monitor) and I was only in around $2000 lol.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        Eyyy, i just upgraded from a 3800x! 9800x3d is a solid improvement. Still using my 2080 TI tho (used display model from microcenter, for $800, in 2020)

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 days ago

          I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t see any improvement upgrading my proc. Graphics card would need to be next im sure.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah, you can build a 1440p native/4k upscale build for like $1000 if not less. I don’t understand what the demand for these cards is. What games benefit?

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    18 days ago

    Either devs are going to have to start finding ways to keep next gen games functioning properly on my 2080ti, or I’m going to have to find a different hobby if AMD follows suite. I will absolutely not be coming close to paying for anything on that scale.

    • pineapplepizza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      2080 will play more than a lifetime supply of indie games. No need to continue supporting anti consumer AAA games

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        I get rarely but newer AAA titles but grab them later on sale. There will be a point when either my card fails or just can’t keep up. If I’m pigeon holed to only lower graphics games, so be it.

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    I mean, there’s such a limited volume rn, that they’re just going to get scalped for that price, so it probably doesn’t affect the end buyer’s price much anyways.

    Still, not a great precedent.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      I’ve always wondered why board partners didn’t just raise to scalper prices and take a $2200 profit per card sold.

      And tbh, it’s Nvidia’s fault that the partners don’t have enough dies, I’d much rather a partner take the margin than an unnecessary middleman.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 days ago

        Same thing with Taylor Swift tickets I guess? I’d imagine it’s because of negative backlash to charging so much. Instead of people being mad at the scalpers, they’d be mad at the retailers.

        I’m personally kind of partial to the lottery method for right to buy, since it cuts down on scalpers.

      • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Pure greed. TSMC built tons of capacity since the pandemic, RAM makers have cut back production because of low prices.

        There is tons of capacity out there to make more graphics cards, even including all the big data centers using them for AI. but i guess its more profitable to only sell cards to rich gamers and AI companies at inflated prices

  • Pringles@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 days ago

    That’s about 10x more than I have ever paid for a gpu and will ever pay for a gpu. Who tf buys this at hose prices? You can go on a 3 month vacation to Thailand for that kind of money.

  • LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    Nvidia’s biggest finacial achievement in their gaming branch was fairly simple, getting rid of the “Titan” nomenclature. That’s it.

    Before we had the XX80’ cards and that was it. All you ever needed for gaming was a XX80 Ti. That was the top of the food chain. Nobody ever expected you to have lr need a Titan card - that would have been ridiculous. The Titan card was a mix between gaming GPU and buisness GPU. It was for people who didn’t want to buy a Quadro Series for work and additionally a GTX/RTX Card for gaming. The Titan was the best of both worlds but came with a high price.

    But now the XX90’ Series is essentially what the Titan Series was. Except now owning a XX80’ Series doesn’t feel like top of the line anymore. Simply by having a card in a generation with a higher “number” than yours, feels like there’s still a higher tier to achieve or like you’re still in “mid” tier, essentialy. Enough people fell for it and started buying the XX90’ Series as if it where a requirement for modern gaming. And after the XX90’ Series became mainstream, game developers stopped optimizing their max setting for the “mid” tier cards. This I why cards like the 4070 Ti or 4080 S still dip below 60 FPS on 1440p on maxed settings in some titles. 60 FPS on maxed is reserved for a 4090 - maximum settings, maximum graphical fidelity, maximum power consumption, maximum price.