alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 8 days agoNintendo applying for anti-Palworld patents in the US with a whopping 22 out of 23 rejected, but "they are fighting"www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up1165arrow-down12cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1163arrow-down1external-linkNintendo applying for anti-Palworld patents in the US with a whopping 22 out of 23 rejected, but "they are fighting"www.windowscentral.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square4fedilinkcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareaeronmelon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up47·8 days agoIt should be illegal to apply for patents with the express purpose of suing someone else over what is now prior art.
minus-squareZorque@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·8 days agoYes, but how does that make rich people more money?
minus-squareNutWrench@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 days agoThis. You don’t “negotiate” with the Patent Office. The courts decide whether patent infringement has occurred. You “negotiate” with THEM.
It should be illegal to apply for patents with the express purpose of suing someone else over what is now prior art.
Yes, but how does that make rich people more money?
This. You don’t “negotiate” with the Patent Office. The courts decide whether patent infringement has occurred. You “negotiate” with THEM.