abobla@lemm.ee to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 24 days agopro tiplemm.eeimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imagepro tiplemm.eeabobla@lemm.ee to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 24 days agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·24 days agoalso set up insults in sudoers for a unique experience
minus-squareShady_Shiroe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·edit-224 days agoAlias albert=apt please albert-get update Edit: oops sorry didn’t mean to reply to your comment, I’m on mobile so I thought was new comment
minus-squareMasta_Chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·24 days agoHow dare you. Straight to Lemmy jail!
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·24 days agoThat’s please albert update nowadays. Why is apt-get still around?
minus-squareKnoLord@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up4·24 days agoapt on its own isn’t safe to use in shell scripts while apt-get is. At least, that is the output I get when using apt in a script on Debian. That is the only reason, for interactive sessions use apt, for automated scripts apt-get.
also set up
insults
in sudoers for a unique experienceAlias albert=apt
please albert-get update
Edit: oops sorry didn’t mean to reply to your comment, I’m on mobile so I thought was new comment
How dare you. Straight to Lemmy jail!
That’s
please albert update
nowadays.Why is apt-get still around?
apt
on its own isn’t safe to use in shell scripts whileapt-get
is. At least, that is the output I get when usingapt
in a script on Debian.That is the only reason, for interactive sessions use
apt
, for automated scriptsapt-get
.