Per one tech forum this week: “Google has quietly installed an app on all Android devices called ‘Android System SafetyCore’. It claims to be a ‘security’ application, but whilst running in the background, it collects call logs, contacts, location, your microphone, and much more making this application ‘spyware’ and a HUGE privacy concern. It is strongly advised to uninstall this program if you can. To do this, navigate to 'Settings’ > 'Apps’, then delete the application.”

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    For people who have not read the article:

    Forbes states that there is no indication that this app can or will “phone home”.

    Its stated use is for other apps to scan an image they have access to find out what kind of thing it is (known as "classification"). For example, to find out if the picture you’ve been sent is a dick-pick so the app can blur it.

    My understanding is that, if this is implemented correctly (a big ‘if’) this can be completely safe.

    Apps requesting classification could be limited to only classifying files that they already have access to. Remember that android has a concept of “scoped storage” nowadays that let you restrict folder access. If this is the case, well it’s no less safe than not having SafetyCore at all. It just saves you space as companies like Signal, WhatsApp etc. no longer need to train and ship their own machine learning models inside their apps, as it becomes a common library / API any app can use.

    It could, of course, if implemented incorrectly, allow apps to snoop without asking for file access. I don’t know enough to say.

    Besides, you think that Google isn’t already scanning for things like CSAM? It’s been confirmed to be done on platforms like Google Photos well before SafetyCore was introduced, though I’ve not seen anything about it being done on devices yet (correct me if I’m wrong).

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Issue is, a certain cult (christian dominionists), with the help of many billionaires (including Muskrat) have installed a fucking dictator in the USA, who are doing their vow to “save every soul on Earth from hell”. If you get a porn ban, it’ll phone not only home, but directly to the FBI’s new “moral police” unit.

    • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doing the scanning on-device doesn’t mean that the findings cannot be reported further. I don’t want others going thru my private stuff without asking - not even machine learning.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This is EXACTLY what Apple tried to do with their on-device CSAM detection, it had a ridiculous amount of safeties to protect people’s privacy and still it got shouted down

      I’m interested in seeing what happens when Holy Google, for which most nerds have a blind spot, does the exact same thing

      EDIT: from looking at the downvotes, it really seems that Google can do no wrong 😆 And Apple is always the bad guy in lemmy

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Apple had it report suspected matches, rather than warning locally

        It got canceled because the fuzzy hashing algorithms turned out to be so insecure it’s unfixable (easy to plant false positives)

        • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          They were not “suspected” they had to be matches to actual CSAM.

          And after that a reduced quality copy was shown to an actual human, not an AI like in Googles case.

          So the false positive would slightly inconvenience a human checker for 15 seconds, not get you Swatted or your account closed

          • Natanael@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Yeah so here’s the next problem - downscaling attacks exists against those algorithms too.

            https://scaling-attacks.net/

            Also, even if those attacks were prevented they’re still going to look through basically your whole album if you trigger the alert

            • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              And you’ll again inconvenience a human slightly as they look at a pixelated copy of a picture of a cat or some noise.

              No cops are called, no accounts closed

              • Natanael@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                The scaling attack specifically can make a photo sent to you look innocent to you and malicious to the reviewer, see the link above

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Overall, I think this needs to be done by a neutral 3rd party. I just have no idea how such a 3rd party could stay neutral. Some with social media content moderation.