• podperson@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is definitely what it’s supposed to do (and a great feature) but unfortunately it doesn’t work that well. Have tried this many times, especially with Amazon links, and it seems to be a bit inconsistent in its effectiveness.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh nice, that is pretty new, but will have to see if it works on those gumroad links. I have an offline script (not a browser extension, I haven’t bothered figuring out how to write those) that edits urls to remove tracking and it’s quite a pain, since there are dozens of sites and tracking schemes it has to know about. Also, rather than creating a pasteable url, a suitable browser extension should just rewrite the link automatically before navitation when you click on it.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        In the case of uBO, just search for “url” in the filter list and you should find it.

      • stalfoss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also this only applies in private browsing mode, which people usually aren’t in

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thanks, I have that too I think. It’s great for sharing from my phone. On my laptop I have a python script that is a lot fancier that I’d like to rewrite as a browser extension someday.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This the most tech illiterate take…

      These are called query parameters. The standard part of the HTTP spec.

      A huge part of the internet uses these simply as a way to instruct a page to display certain data or to display a particular view or layout of that data.

      Calling for an extension to get rid of these it’s like calling for an extension to get rid of headers because websites use them to pass metadata in the same manner.

      Edit: that was harsh my apologies.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There are in fact many extensions designed to suppress or rewrite headers, most notably cookies, but also proxy headers and other things like that. Stripping out privacy invading (or in this case revenue redirecting) query parameters is another thing that extensions can do, and there are various extensions for that too, including apparently ublock origin (UBO).

        UBO is not able to rewrite urls completely (a deliberate decision to protect users from accidental or intentional security breaking rules appearing in rule lists) but there are other extensions that do that too, like changing www.reddit.com to old.reddit.com, or bypassing google redirects and link shorteners that snoop on user activity. The web is a predator-prey ecosystem (users are mostly prey) and it is necessary to respond to new hazards as they appear.