• tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Exactly this. The majority of super-popular names now will all be “old person” names in future.

      In turn, the “old person” names of the recently deceased generations, like ‘Florence’ and ‘Edith’ are starting to reappear and be given to children again, because with that old generation dead they are freed from the old-people stereotype and seem good again. It’s cyclical.

      Amongst all names, there are some which are conversely a lot harder to date. Names that are always being given, but never top the popularity lists. Names like Mark, Thomas, or Matthew. Harder to date people with names like these, because there’s always plenty of them.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The commonly used names from religions will always dominate top name lists for sure.

      • olosta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The cycle is reinforced by people giving the name of their grand parents to their kids.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah but it seems like some names are always somewhat popular no matter the era. “John” and “James” for example