• b1t@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This has always blown my mind. Watching people willingly allow Big Brother-esque devices into their home for very, very minor conveniences like turning on some gimmicky multi-colored light bulbs. Now they’re literally using home “security” cameras that store everything on some random cloud server. I’ll truly never understand.

    • loie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean… I 100% agree, and yet you and I and everyone reading this are carrying around a phone that can do the exact same shit

      • b1t@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is why jailbreaking/rooting your phone is so important.

      • b1t@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        My brother and a buddy both have Alexas. And yeah, I hate being anywhere near the thing.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Why has no security researcher published evidence of these devices with microphones uploading random conversations? Nobody working on the inside has ever leaked anything regarding this potentially massive breach of privacy? A perfectly secret conspiracy by everyone involved?

      We know more about top secret NSA programs than we do about this proposed Alexa spy mechanism. None of the people working on this at Amazon have wanted to leak anything?

      I’m not saying it’s not possible, but it seems extremely improbable to me that everyone’s microphones are listening to their conversations, they’re being uploaded somewhere to serve them better ads, and absolutely nobody has leaked anything or found any evidence.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m not saying it’s not possible

          There is no argument from ignorance fallacy in what I said. I am not claiming these devices never send audio without you wanting because there’s no evidence to the contrary.

          However, the idea that everyone’s microphones are always listening, and that’s why you saw an ad for whatever after talking to your friend, yet not a single person has observed a device uploading this kind of data, nor has anyone ever leaked any kind of information on this supposed system, is extremely unlikely to be true in my opinion.

          They don’t need microphones to do this. Regular tracking is plenty to do a good job at suggesting you a highly relevant ad, and frequency illusion does the rest. You’re not noticing the thousand times you see ads that are irrelevant to whatever you were talking about, but the one time you do notice really sticks out.

          Frankly there are plenty of more concerning ways of violating our privacy that are out in the open that I believe are a much higher priority than mics always recording, of which there is no evidence for.

          • b1t@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            If no proof is offered (in either direction), then the proposition can be called unproven, undecided, inconclusive, an open problem or a conjecture.

            Stating that you don’t think that it’s possible is irrelevant. It’s either happening or it isn’t. True or false. P or ¬P.

            is extremely unlikely to be true in my opinion.

            Is an argument from ignorance. Not trying to be rude, but this is basic logic.

              • b1t@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                See my previous post…

                It’s better to be safe than sorry is all I’m saying.

                Also 3 separate cases have been posted above. Just continue ignoring those, I guess.

                  • b1t@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Mad.

                    Edit: They’ve edited both of their previous posts to re-frame the argument after the fact and removed a personal attack. Classy.

          • b1t@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, but it’s rooted and running a custom ROM ;)

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because if they would publish it, the other security experts would say “well, duh, that’s how it works”.

        It is just the average people that are unaware of it, or don’t seem to care.