• A jetlagged Troy Hunt accidentally clicked a link and logged into an account only to realise he had been phished.
  • Despite reacting quickly, attackers were able to export a mailing list for Hunt’s personal blog.
  • Hunt has detailed the attack and warned his subscribers in a timely fashion.
    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It indicates a pause, and a separation of the two objects in the sentence. It is a subtly different sentence than “Have I been Pwned owner Pwned”, and is clearer with greater emphasis on what happened.

      • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        wouldn’t it be clearer with

        • “Have I Been Pwned” owner pwned.

        • Owner of “Have I Been Pwned” pwned.

        ?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        It feels awkward to me. I don’t think it’s grammatically correct. To me, it doesn’t add any clarity, especially when the comma could’ve been the word “got” or something, lol

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I think a professional headline would usually just lack the comma there. Headlines typically have weird phrasing (due to their terseness), but they’re generally still grammatically sound.

            I think “HackerNews owner hacked” would be a headline, rather than “HackerNews owner, hacked”.

            “Have I Been Pwned owner pwned” seems to be on par with “Headline English” to me