• Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Firstly, it’s not art. I already hate that OP called it that. It’s AI generated imagery. There is no art involved outside of art theft.

    Secondly, it’s legal art theft created by those types of people that either never considered artists to have any value, or have a chip on their shoulder against artists.

    Thirdly, at no point in history have artists ever been appreciated, despite art being the most important element of everything. Imagine right now what a user interface would look like without artistic design. Or a car. Or your toothbrush. AI gen shafts artists… again… with the absolutely ridiculously, flippant argument that it “democratises art”, as if it’s some sort of noble privilege rather than a skill literally anyone can practice.

    • occultist8128@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      i’m not only referring to images, but all kind of “art” that can be music, imagery, etc.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        The same can be applied to all artistic mediums. But it’s arguably used most for generating text and images.

        • occultist8128@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          it’s arguably used most for generating text and images.

          yeah i know, that’s why you hating on me by me, saying it’s “art” but supposed to be “AI generated imagery”. we can make “music” from AI now. thanks for your response anyway!