• RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Nazis were fascists that looked to create a 1000 year reich and believed the destiny was to birth the master race. Trump et al are not doing this which means they are a different kind of fascist than Nazis. That doesn’t make it better much like being shot with a .308 instead of a .44 caliber round isn’t “better” it just makes it a different kind of harm.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’d say that the nazi salute on live tv sealed the deal.

      If it looks like a Nazi and squeak like a Nazi, it’s a fucking Nazi.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        From my reply to another

        "Ok? How does that change my statement that they are a different kind of fascist? Keep in mind my point is entirely focused on the ideology part of the political ideology whereas you are talking about a salute. How does an arm motion change the policy goals which aren’t the same as what Nazis support? What policy goal can you derive from an arm motion to begin with?

        They are still evil they are just a different kind of evil. Not all fascists are nazis. The fact that one guy did a nazi salute twice doesn’t change project 2025 into something that Nazis would support."

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Taxonomy.

          • A cat is [animal]
          • A dog is an [animal]

          The nazi’s did such a good job of distinguishing themselves they created their own (colloquial) taxonomic branch.

          So [nazi] could be considered a parent grouping of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party and also potentially a parent grouping for the republicans.

          I think they key here is separating the nazi party from the [nazi] category

          As you pointed out all [nazi]'s are [fascist]'s but not all [fascist]'s are [nazi]'s

          • National Socialist German Workers’ Party were [nazi]'s
          • The American Republican Party are subjectively showing enough similarities (both in type and progression) that they get the provisional label of [nazi] as it’s the closest existing definition.

          Might turn out that they don’t quite fall in the same branch, might turn out they do. Until then [nazi] is an easy shortcut for describing the types of behaviour displayed.

          Even if they were just a direct descendent ( taxonomically ) rather than a sibling of the original nazi party there would still be an argument to claim they were nazi’s

          Like :

          • animal -> mammal -> cat
          • nazi -> nazi party -> republican

          Come back in a few years and you’ll probably get your definitive answer either way.

          You don’t have to agree with any of that of course, but it does demonstrate how someone might have an opposing opinion to your own.