The services are maybe hosted by myself, but the servers aren’t mine. I’m only borrowing a small chunk of resources from some company, so can it still be considered self-hosting?

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Self-hosting is just a generalized term for running your own stacks instead of just using the standard corpo stuff. It’s not a regimen or lifestyle or anything like that. Don’t worry about the terminology.

  • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    It’s self hosting. Is it home lab? Nope. Though plenty of people use VPS as a way to terminate their VPN connections and such.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Self-hosting isn’t only just about owning the metal, but it’s also the freedom to configure things the way you want, and to be sovereign of your data.

  • drspod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    If you’re not cycling a pedal-powered generator to run your system then is it really self-hosted? My servers only use organic transistors grown in my zen garden.

  • qpsLCV5@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 days ago

    i’d argue yes. if it’s just a plain linux vps without any additional services, you’re still doing plenty of setup yourself.

  • irmadlad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I run a hybrid: 3 VPS and a rack in the closet. I don’t get hung up about labels. I leave that to others who obsess about that sort of stuff.