• arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    Should be two pronged - tariffs on cloud and other services while fostering competitive local alternatives. While it’s possible knock up a cloud out of anything there is nothing in Europe as coherent as the offerings by Amazon, Google or Microsoft. And there should be.

  • professionalbalkan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    18 minutes ago

    This in combination with deregulating the single market and allowing EU tech startup to thrive would finally give birth to real competitors on our continent

    GoEU

    • phar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Pardon my ignorance but what does deregulating the single Market mean?

  • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    231
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Yes. Tech billionaires are the ones who stood behind Trump proudly on inauguration day, so let’s start using Canadian/European options. Plenty of them match what those tech companies offer anyway.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Deleted meta acccount with a note referencing trump and zuck. Not much but its what I had to do

    • skozzii@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I believe this is how we can cripple the US.

      I just switched my services over and there are some great alternatives, we have just been pre-programmed to use the American default brands.

      Adobe, Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon all easy to replace.

      The only challenging one so far is YouTube, content is just lacking elsewhere, but atleast with adblockers YouTube isn’t getting my money.

      • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        19 hours ago

        As an American I’m here for it and encourage it. These greedy evil fuckers need to be brought down and if we have to burn it all down so be it, so we can rebuild better. What we have now is clearly not functioning for anyone but the 1%.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Any recommendations? It seems a lot of my alternatives are turning heel and I would like more options. Preferably ones not likely to turn heel.

      • Engywook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        TBF, just leaving YouTube would be better. There’s plenty of information out there which don’t need some glorified video hosting platform (books, blogs, wikis and so oh). I really struggle trying to understand people’s addiction to YT…

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I like long form video content from someone who is passionate about a subject

        • Comtief@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          It’s not really the same kind of media at all, depending on what you watch. I guess what I look for in YouTube are interesting perspectives, often on things I haven’t even considered. Maybe something like blogs could partially replace it, but I’m not aware of any blogging platforms that have tons of interesting perspectives and things to talk about and actually knows what to offer me. Isn’t blogging kind of dead?

          I used to read books when I was younger, but I have serious attention issues with text-only stuff. And it’s straining on eyes.

        • philthi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I use YouTube extensively (I mean, 2-5 hours a day) and 7 days a week for years now; I use it for language learning, there is really nothing better than normal people chatting (to the camera or between themselves) about regular daily stuff that I’m also interested in, to improve comprehension, I’d love to find any source as rich as YouTube. Peertube is hopeless, I tried and failed there due to a complete lack of content (though I do check in occasionally, I’d love if some of my subscribed YouTubers would start publishing on that platform… Though I don’t know if there are any monetary incentives for them to do that?).

          • Engywook@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I’m specifically talking about the video as a medium to share information, and youtube is the worst, as it’s 99% filled with crappy influencer stuff whose only aim is to monetize people’s time.

            • philthi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              Sure there’s that. I’m just trying to help you understand the viewpoint of some of the people that are heavy users of YouTube, and why there are currently no good alternatives, as you said “I really struggle trying to understand”.

              I’m sure, like me, there are other people with their own alternative valid reasons for using YouTube for enormous amounts of time.

              Just because some of the content on a platform is bad or not to our tastes, doesn’t mean it all is, and it certainly doesn’t mean that the users are wrong for using that platform in a way that suits them.

              I do disagree with the publishing of content that is hateful or deliberately trying to misinform people, and I think YouTube has a lot of that, I’d obviously prefer it didn’t.

          • purrtastic@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Can you not just make sure YouTube gets none of your money by using a front end that strips out all ads and sponsored segments? My kids watch YouTube but they’ve never seen an ad.

            • philthi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I pay for YouTube premium. Although I’d prefer to find an EU alternative, I really have no problem paying for a service that I consider worth the price.

              A red flag for me, is if I’m paying for a service and they still show me adverts.

      • andallthat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        yes, there are clearly unfair trade practices here. EU has been making money for Google and Amazon, but the US are not using our services. I hear the best solution to this are tariffs: EU users have to pay to use gmail until enough US users start using EU email providers and we rebalance the services trade!

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Do it, fuck up Twitter, Amazon, meta, and everyone else that shared a stage with trump.

    The only language they know is $, if trump is bad for their money, they’ll go against trump.

    These are people obsessed with wealth over every thing else, it’s not hard to manipulate them, but when rational adults regain power, we need to tax the ever loving shit out of them because no matter what happens, they’ll always choose “more money”.

    • Alphane Moon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I wouldn’t go as far as saying it’s very easy to manipulate American oligarchs. However, they are relatively provincial and lack the capabilities to deal with truly complex challenges.

      They operate in an environment with no real risk. They’ve never dealt with any real challenges. The US judicial system is a joke (even in China, Alibaba’s Jack Ma immediately regretted going on a public chimp out). US society is either openly supportive of corruption and criminality or lacks the capability (true desire and risk tolerance) to address corruption.

      This is not to underestimate American oligarchs. They are extremely sophisticated and absolutely committed to their “number go up” fetish, but you also have to be real about what they are.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    23 hours ago

    All it takes is a critical mass of users to make their own Facebook. A continental divide seems like a good place.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      When America sends their users, they’re not sending their best. They’re sending trolls, shitposters, influencers. They’re bringing Ben Shapiro and Alex Jones. And some, I assume, are good users.

      Edit: The original quote (about Mexicans) is from 2015. Feel old yet?

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Sounds like a good idea, hit them where it hurts! I left Big Tech a while ago, but if the EU can hit them with tariffs and hurt people like Zuck and (F)Elon, awesome!

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Newspapers, magazines, TV, film, movies, broadcasts are all regulated nationally and internationally

    The same should be done for corporate social media companies who basically deliver all or most news content and information to people everywhere today.

    The current state of the world is like being in the 1900s and only having six major newspapers in the world owned by big corporations and none of the content they publish or share is regulated or controlled.

  • meliante@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I was afraid of this… I support it but don’t need it. Oh well… Fuck the USA anyway!