Mozilla partners with Ecosia for a better web | The Mozilla Blog
blog.mozilla.org
Your tech choices matter more than ever. That’s why at Mozilla, we believe in empowering users to make informed decisions that align with their values. I

Illustration of overlapping browser windows with Ecosia’s logo, a tree graphic, Firefox’s logo, and the text “Together for a better web,” alongside a search bar with a green cursor.

Your tech choices matter more than ever. That’s why at Mozilla, we believe in empowering users to make informed decisions that align with their values. In that spirit, we’re excited to announce our partnership with Ecosia, a search engine that prioritizes sustainability, and social impact.

Did you know you could choose the search engine of your choice right from your Firefox URL bar? Whether you prioritize privacy, climate protection, or simply want a search experience tailored to your preferences, we’ve got you covered.

Ecosia goes beyond data protection by addressing environmental concerns. Every search made through the search engine contributes to tree-planting projects worldwide, helping to combat deforestation and regenerate the planet. Ecosia planted over 215 million trees, across the planet biodiversity hotspots, making a tangible difference in the fight against climate change. Just like Mozilla, they are committed to creating a better internet, and world, for everyone.

Together, Mozilla, Firefox and Ecosia are contributing to a web that is more open and inclusive, but above all — one where you can make an informed choice about what tech you use and why. Your tech choices make a difference.

As Firefox and Mozilla continue to champion user empowerment and innovation, we invite you to join us in shaping a web that makes the world better. Together, let’s make a positive impact — one search at a time.

  • tb_@lemmy.world
    2·
    12 days ago

    I keep hearing about Kagi, maybe I should try it sometime.

    DDG has been quite serviceable to me, however. If I can’t find something I can just add a quick !g to my already existing query and look it up on Google instead, which I’ve found rather convenient.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      1·
      12 days ago

      If I can’t find something I can just add a quick !g to my already existing query and look it up on Google instead, which I’ve found rather convenient.

      Yeah I used to do the same (but with !s).

      It’s much more convenient to just have good search results to begin with though. Kagi uses the Google index and a few others and you have your own filtering and ranking on top.

      In the beginning I felt tempted to do !s a few times too but the results were always worse, so I quickly unlearned doing that.

      Executing bangs is also a lot quicker with Kagi; DDG is kind of a slog.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        1·
        12 days ago

        but with !s

        Is that built-in, or do you have to configure it yourself? Configuring one is fine, but DDG has quite a few I semi-frequently use (!i, !g, !gi, !yt, !w, !gt), even Google itself feels like a downgrade when I want to search an image and I manually have to click the ‘images’ tab after performing my query.

        It’s much more convenient to just have good search results to begin with though

        I agree, which is why I’ve been happy to continue using DDG.

        • Atemu@lemmy.ml
          2·
          12 days ago

          Is that built-in, or do you have to configure it yourself

          It’s the official bang for Startpage. You can’t configure custom bangs in DDG; Kagi can do that.

          I agree, which is why I’ve been happy to continue using DDG.

          I’ve found DDG/bing’s results to be quite lacking.

          • tb_@lemmy.world
            1·
            12 days ago

            It’s the official bang for Startpage. You can’t configure custom bangs in DDG; Kagi can do that.

            Oh, like so. When you said “same” I assumed you meant Google as well, and I found !s to be an intuitive bang for that. Startpage makes more sense, I know they get their results through Google.

            I’ve found DDG/bing’s results to be quite lacking.

            It seems our experiences have been different, then.