Prices rose to $595 per kilogram, a 17% increase over the previous level on December 11

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d imagine this will lead to more gallium mining outside of China ramping up, but I’m not sure.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Might not need to even have much new mining.

      Gallium is primarily extracted from bauxite, which is already mined worldwide for aluminum processing. So with gallium being a very small byproduct of aluminum processing from mined bauxite, the bottleneck probably isn’t in the mines, because mining and processing bauxite is already something many countries do. It’s just not always economically profitable to further process the gallium at the same time, but if the need is there, that can be ramped up at existing aluminum plants.

      It’s not an overnight process but with many elements, the limiting factor isn’t actual rarity, but the high energy/equipment needs of the process to extract and purify the element, and the high amounts of waste produced.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’d think, but its easier to just charge an extra 20% and then blame China while pocketing the extra 3%.

      We wont start mining for rare earth metals until they simply refuse to sell to us.

      • Avieshek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Cheap labour followed by infrastructure if not (kinda corrupt system) government is also a thing.

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would take years for new mining to begin to come on line. No one takes that risk based on the short term of a single presidential term.