The European Commission sees open-source software as more than an IT tool. Policy makers are encouraging open-source ecosystems to drive innovation, autonomy and collaboration in a world where global trade is being redrawn.

This trade dispute highlights something most open-source advocates have known for years: open source is freedom. It’s freedom from monopolies, freedom from arbitrary pricing, and freedom from foreign influence.

    • The Menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Several EU countries already have fascists or borderline fascists in the government (Italy, the Netherlands, Hungary) or have a raising fascist force grabbing for power (e.g. Germany, Sweden).

      Don’t expect too much from the EU. We might very well overtake you on the road to open fascist total control.

  • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    SEE!!! Trump is doing some good! It’s about time the power was taken from these arrogant, invasive, Silicon Valley companies.

  • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 days ago

    But… This is a good thing. I will take it. More FOSS awareness is great news. As long as it sticks.

    • eleitl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s not going to, though. As soon as the tariffs disapper they’ll be impersonating Dory, again.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Can I say that the issue is much deeper than just tariffs, and that Europe should not be using anything cloud or AI based? Ideally not even from EU if not fully open-source or open-data.

  • artifactsofchina@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is what I’m excited about. My parents are in the market for new laptops, I’m going to see if they will take a framework running popOS and make the switch to Linux. It’s incredible that this option is now so approachable.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Throw something like Mint on their old laptops and they may not need new ones at all!

      Unless they don’t have current ones, then ignore me, lol.

      • artifactsofchina@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Hey, that’s a good point!

        I think they’re keen to buy something new, so my main excitement is hey look a shop where you can start with Linux in the first place.

        But I could also end up showing them how to repurpose their current laptops as media servers or something, which would be cool!

  • Evotech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    If only every open source software didn’t lock enterprise features behind licenses….

    Companies still have to fork 90% of useful Foss projects and not upstream changes because they need to reimplement HA features and SSO etc every time

  • nihilist_hippie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    12 days ago

    Lemmy seems to be anti-AI, at least from my impression, but I am hopeful that AI will help invigorate the open source software world. If people can code better, faster, cheaper, safer (more secure) that will surely apply to open source as well. AI coding tools could bring on the Linux mainstream revolution. Imagine thousands of autonomous agents refining software for Linux. There could be a glut of driver support, apps coming to Linux, and so much more. I am hopeful about it.

    • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      If people can code better, faster, cheaper, safer (more secure) that will surely apply to open source as well.

      I’m not European, but I understand that there’s an old European (German?) saying that basically goes: “If I had wheels, I’d be a trolley.” I understand that it’s been pretty well-established that AI coding tools routinely underperform compare to humans in terms of “better” and “safer”, which indirectly would also lead to it failing at “cheaper” too.

      On top of that, there is another major issue with using AI for open-source code: copyright. First, you don’t know if the code that you’re adding through AI may be copying license-incompatible code verbatim. Because everyone has access to open-source code, it would be trivial for anyone to search and find copyright-infringing code to attack projects with. Second, the code that AI produces is also not-copyrightable, so that is another line of attack that this would make open-source projects vulnerable to. These could be used in combination as a one-two punch combination to knock out an open-source project.

      I think that using AI-generated code in open-source projects is a uniquely ill-advised idea.