Is it weird? Is it rude? Should threads be archived?

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It is a holdover from the old forum days when adding a comment would pop a thread to the top of the front page, so someone going through and commenting on multiple old posts would flood the front page with outdated discussions. Generally those people would also post worthless comments, like ‘Thanks’, that didn’t add anything.

    Now that we have more ways to sort the underlying problem is no longer relevant, but some people still hold on to that mindset. Some people who weren’t around for the older forums may have caught the disdain from others, or could even just have it in their minds that discussions always have limited time frames for whatever reason.

    I don’t care unless someone relies to my comment to continue some stupid argument they started four months ago.

    • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh I didn’t know that! I didn’t grow up on forums but I used them a few times here and there. You’re right new replies do push a thread to the top. Kind of a bad design lol.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        It was a great design when the intent was to make new discussion visible. It was great for reviving threads when new and prodictive discussion was added!

        Like any design, there will be cases where it doesn’t work as intended. It is hard to design around people adding non-productive comments.

        • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Fair point

          There’s only one forum I visit nowadays and it gets older threads revived every now and then. Usually to say “Whatever happened to that? Is it done yet?”