• LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      The people behind this and ‘Leopards Eating People’s Faces’ are visionaries

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am re-reading peak Stephenson cyberpunk (Snow Crash, Diamond Age) and it just hits different when you feel like you’re reading from inside the prequel.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    the problem is conservatives are incapable of abstract thought, so they have no media literacy and can never think about what the stories mean. even when they’re quite explicit.

    that’s why a moron like elon looks at them and thinks “cool, Torment Nexus, it even has the cool X in the name! I should have someone make that. and the world will finally love me.”

    • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean I feel like it’s less conservatives in general not having media literacy and just people in general not having media literacy. Even liberals will watch stuff like Andor and still not understand the deeper messages it has about resistance. At the end of the day it’s just a general lack of education especially in America.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I mean liberals are a whole other thing but even if you would say this about leftists instead, my point didn’t imply that the exact opposite is true: obviously being a leftist doesn’t automatically make you a genius media analyst. I’m just saying the conservative mindset is extremely adverse to any level of abstraction, which renders them incapable of a lot of things, understanding analogies being one of them.

        also why they can never understand big picture issues (I’m holding a snowball so global warming can’t be real), prioritize statistics over anecdotes (I got sick after a shot so vaccines don’t work at all), or empathize with people they don’t know (eg oppose gay rights, only to support when a family member comes out–if at all).

        now that doesn’t mean someone who believes in worker rights automatically is better at all of this, but at least it isn’t physically impossible for them to be so.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The world is turning into the cyberpunk universe. Just with multitudes more corpo fascist shit and very little of the technology.

    And geopolitically it’s headed that way. How many of the following traits do you think will come true ?

    In cyberpunk…

    North America is a wasteland. 60 percent of the population dies of famine. There’s a civil war in America. And private entities carved out their own fiefdoms where everyone except the executive class lives like cattle

    Eastern Europe and most of Asia minor is a never ending warzone

    Western Europe and east Asia become the world’s financial and economic centers. Except they too live with their own disasters

    Entire countries are wiped off the map either from war or climate disaster

      • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I feel like anyone would be pissed off if some hack ‘journalists’ spilled the beans that you were gay while you were physically inside a country which murders homosexuals.

        • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t have the context to process this, but I’m very much for civil rights as a minimum standard. Thiel should be banished to a small island off the shores of Antarctica, but not because he’s gay.

          • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The first time I heard about the guy it was because some online journalists for a tabloidish publication posted a story exposing him as being gay while he was in Saudi Arabia for some meetings.

            • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s pretty crappy, yeah. If it makes you feel better, he’s capitalist first and gay second. He’s funded various anti-LGBTQ politicians and supports things like Praxis that are working toward a new kind of plutocracy/feudalism.

  • Prehensile_cloaca @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    As suspected, society falling apart really boils down to a bunch of shit heels with poor reading comprehension.

  • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just want to add, Musk’s Grandad, the enlightened scientist and leader of the technocratic movement, was a chiropractor. They’re all crooks.

  • Highlybaked@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    And this dude is tweeting on the torment nexus despite its nazi owner making money when people use it

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I think I’ve come to realize it’s actually the other way around. People create some cool things. Good Sci-fi uses that technology to reveal things about our culture and society. Bad Sci-fi just makes it the most evil villainous thing out for reasons. There is a lot of bad Sci-fi. We all grow up reading and watching it. The people who create stories for other shows we watch, all grew up reading and absorbing it. It then becomes our zeitgeist that any new tech will ultimately be our doom. Its a tyrannical chicken dystopian egg problem.

    ultimately the technology that we all should have been concerned about was books.

  • Aux@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Corporations are more efficient than governments. Getting rid of governments and moving towards corporate dominance is the only move forward.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Now please excuse us while we charge twice as much for this previously government run service and run it so poorly that it slowly collapses.

      • Aux@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        The previous experience shows that in most cases services run privately are better quality and cheaper. Unless you live in a 3rd world country like the US.

        • SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          My water is privatised. My waterways are full of shit. Every single one. The companies are bitching about needing money to fix the pipes even though they are getting more money than ever before but the CEO is getting a bonus for doing such a “good job”. Fuck off.

          Oh my Internet is also privatised too and I have two options dog shit speed or dog shit stability.

          The buses are privatised the timetable says a bus every 20 minutes. They show up every hour on a good day and you have to check their site and guess when the bus is going to pull to your stop based on where it is on the route.

          Trains are most expensive in europe. Technically they are state owned. Foreign state owned. But hey atleast the track is still state owned.

          Privatisation is bollocks. You don’t get the competition lowers cost when your options are a single company. Even then they would collude on pricing or mopolise anyway.

          • Aux@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            With the exception of water, where the government botched the privatisation, and trains, which are under full government control, everything else in the UK benefited greatly from privatisation. Back in the days you couldn’t even get a phone line installed. The fuck are you even complaining about?

            • SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Look if private companies want to make their own networks they can go right ahead I don’t see why politicians buddies should be allowed to buy infrastructure on the cheap.

              Internet access is effectively a duopoly with Virgin on one side and everyone else reselling OpenReach on the other.

              What do you mean trains are under full government control? 10 of the 14 train companies are private entities. Labour is putting them back under state ownership currently, well said they will.

              Privitisation is always short term gain for a long term loss.

              There is also the NHS which is constantly kneecapped to make privatisation seem like a good idea too.

              I also don’t believe private entities should be allowed to own defacto monopolies and critical infrastructure you can put as many rules as you like in it’s still not a good idea.

      • Aux@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        A ratio between resources spent to achieve a specific result.

        • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Then corporations are very inefficient - they waste incredible amount of resources on advertising, stock buybacks and undermining their competition, they exploit renewable resources way past their replenishment rates (look what happened to tuna and codfish), they ignore ecological damage they create, pursue increasing wealth inequality and try to leech off state subsidies and direct technology transfers.

          The only way you can call corporations efficient if the desired result is the short term profits of the shareholders.

          • Aux@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ads, buybacks, etc all bring value to the company. Exploration of renewables past their replenishing rates is the definition of efficiency. You basically want to live in a stone age.