• illi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok, so his family believed he would forgive, wrote statement for him and made AI make it look like the victim said it. And this is somehow relevant to the court? It’s all nice the family thinks this but what has it got with justice?

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      But, the Judge, Todd Lang, loved that AI. It was well received. Go figure.

      We’re living in a parallel universe now.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    WTF?

    That man did not say anything. A computer algorithm smashed a video together they incidentally uses his likeness, nothing more

  • besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d rather have somebody puppet my corpse like in Weekend at Bernie’s. Basically the same thing but more authentic

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    Unless stated otherwise, please do not use my likeness for legal proceedings on the event of my untimely passing. Please.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is awesome. Next we can have AI Jesus endorsing Trump, AI Nicole Simpson telling us who the real killer was, and AI Abraham Lincoln saying that whole Civil War thing was a big misunderstanding and the Confederacy was actually just fine. The possibilities are endless. I can hardly wait!

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      and AI Abraham Lincoln saying that whole Civil War thing was a big misunderstanding and the Confederacy was actually just fine

      Considering he loved the Dixieland song, and his views on society normal for his time, and the intelligence of the average citizen, and those “AI’s” being an extrapolator of meaningless traits on the average citizen’s intelligence - we might actually learn that he’s sorry, he was wrong and we should all go rebel.

  • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Eww, that’s such a ghoulish thing to do; letting a distortion of a dead person, that could never act as the deceased person, forgive their killer. Do they even know if he would’ve done this if he had a say before being killed?

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why even do an impact statement? All Christian victims should be assumed to forgive their attackers, right?

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    While the state asked for a nine-and-a-half year sentence, the judge handed Horcasitas a 10-and-a-half year sentence after being so moved by the video, Pelkey’s family said, noting the judge even referred to the video in his statement

    So first of all I guess all that stuff in the video about forgiveness wasn’t really a factor. I’m just fascinated who called for this? Like was it the prosecution? In what context? Was this part of their closing arguments? Did the defense not object? So many questions.

    You have to wonder if this is not grounds for an appeal.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Legally speaking, this was a victim impact statement.

      Convicted criminals have long had the common law right of allocution, where they can say anything they want directly to the judge before sentence is passed.

      Starting a few decades ago, several states decided that the victims of crime should have a similar right to address the judge before sentencing. And so the victim impact statement was created.

      It’s not evidence, and it’s not under oath, but it is allowed to influence the sentencing decision.

      (Of course, victim impact statements are normally given by real victims).

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    An AI version of Christopher Pelkey appeared in an eerily realistic video to forgive his killer… “In another life, we probably could’ve been friends. I believe in forgiveness, and a God who forgives.”

    “…and while it took my murder to get my wings as an angel in heaven, you still on Earth can get close with Red Bull ™. Red Bull ™ gives you wings!” /s