• Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Tax Eat the rich!

    Here’s the thing. Even if he lives up to this promise, it’s still him deciding where that money should go, and it won’t be towards long term support of social safety nets for the commoners. He should just have been paying his fair share of taxes all along and into the future.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Based on current spending, it will most likely be spent getting drinkable water to the majority of the world’s population.

      I don’t like how he got his money, but he’s been reasonably responsible with it since his divorce.

      That said, he has over $113b dollars. If he gives away 99% of it, he’ll still have over a billion dollars.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        Behind the bastards has a good two parter on him. I wouldn’t say he’s been responsible with it.

      • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        He’s been buying up huge swathes of farm land in the middle of the country. Not everything he’s doing has been philanthropy

    • madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      …or paying his employees more.

      Funny how we don’t have a popular term for the portion of an employee’s deserved wage that turns into “record shareholder profit.”

      Imagine if all corporations were required to put a line item on check stubs showing how much you made them.

        • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean if I want my next of kin/whoever to get my money, it’s better to do it while alive when you can get creative with the accounting. Especially when you’ve got Gates money and setting up something like a nonprofit is relatively easy.

          Once you’re dead and you’ve got this lump declared assets you’re trying to pass on that Uncle Sam will take up to like 40% of.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah but that’s communism, so no way it would’ve ever happened. The average American voter thinks they can become billionaires some day.

      • Skvlp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Does the word communism even have meaning any more, or is it just something to yell when confused people get confused?

          • Skvlp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I know, I caught the silent /s at the end of your post :) You are referring to people who don’t use it sarcastically - does the word communism have meaning left when they use it?

            • comfy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Honestly, it might just be creeping closer to “social”. As in, concerning a society. Things like bike lanes and healthcare.