• besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 months ago

    You guys actually allow websites to send you notifications? Pretty much every site that has asked me to allow notifications is one that I wouldn’t want notifications from.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I am an IT guy and at our office there have been two users in the last year who has somehow enabled notifications from what is clearly a spam site which keeps spamming notifications as if it were McAffee Anti-Virus.

      I need to get a policy pushed out to disable any requests for new notifications from websites…

      • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Where I used to work, they got those from those shady pirated audiobook sites. Just log their DNS queries for a week and you’ll know what to block.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I use it for my self hosted apps, but yeah, it’s rarely useful for websites in the wild.

    • ilmagico@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Gmail, outlook web, whatsapp web, slack web … just some examples of webapps that I use or used in the past that someone might legitimately want notifications from. Maybe you don’t use them, or are not required to use them for work, and that’s fine.

      The article is specifically talking about android though, and there you’d most likely use an app for those, so I personally never needed them on mobile, but I can see someone else might need them.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Notifications in Chrome are a useful feature to keep up with updates from your favorite sites.

    No, they most definitely are not. This is something I’ve never wanted or used, and almost certainly never will.

    Why does this feature even exist?

    • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I firmly believe the day Randal dies will be the day many of us stop using the internet.

  • forked_bytes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why use ai for this? Just block notifications by default and manually allow the sites you want.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, I actually want that. There are use cases where it can really improve things - best example is the local translation feature in Firefox. Would you really rather have no translations, or ones that go through a server?

      This also seems like a useful feature.

  • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok, so how can I, as web developer, monitor if my notifications are rejected by this?

    • evujumenuk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Anti-abuse measures such as this are generally designed to not provide that kind of feedback. The website developer is modeled to be an adversary, and you don’t volunteer valuable information on what has worked against your countermeasures, and what hasn’t, to your designated enemy.