• conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    They’re pretty okay for shallow understanding on a subject, but Wendover (not on the list), Economics Explained (not on the list), and CGP gray all get stuff pretty wrong once you get past shallow depth. I know because I’m a huge transit/urbanism nerd. If these channels haven’t wronged you in some minor way, they just haven’t talked about something you’re a subject matter expert in yet. The point here isn’t that they’re bad, just understand that these are shallow explainers, the next step in from like a news article, Wikipedia, or a blog, and take them with a grain of salt.

    My personal list is Kurzgesagt, XKCD explained, and The Action Lab.

    • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Do you have examples of CGP Grey getting things pretty wrong aside from his Solution to Traffic video which I indeed think holds up poorly.

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        The Solution to Traffic video, like you mentioned, springs to mind, but so does the one based on Guns, Germs, and Steel

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Right? I’m surprised by this claim as when he found out he made a pretty minor error in his video on an abandoned missile silo, he made a whole other video to address it.