• ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    He said most people are playing at 1080p, and last month’s Steam survey had 55% of users with that as their primary display resolution, so he’s right about that. Ignore what’s needed for the 4K monitor only 4.5% of users have as their primary display; is 8GB VRAM really a problem at 1080p?

    • leave_it_blank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Absolutely. Why pay more if less is good enough?

      They are open about it, and give the option to get more RAM if you want it. Fine by me.

      No one with a 4k monitor will by them anyway.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        Absolutely. Why pay more if less is good enough?

        Different problem, IMO.

    • obsoleteacct@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      29 days ago
      1. Why would they be buying a new card to play how they’re already playing?
      2. What does the long term trend line look like?

      You can confidently say that this is fine for most consumers today. There really isn’t a great argument that this will serve most consumers well for the next 3 to 5 years.

      It’s ok if well informed consumers are fine with a compromise for their use case.

      Misrepresenting the product category, and misleading less informed consumers to believe that it’s not a second rate product in the current generation is deeply anti-consumer.