• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 天前

    Tbf, the article should probably mention the fact that machine learning programs designed to play chess blow everything else out of the water.

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 天前

      Machine learning has existed for many years, now. The issue is with these funding-hungry new companies taking their LLMs, repackaging them as “AI” and attributing every ML win ever to “AI”.

      ML programs designed and trained specifically to identify tumors in medical imaging have become good diagnostic tools. But if you read in news that “AI helps cure cancer”, it makes it sound like it was a lone researcher who spent a few minutes engineering the right prompt for Copilot.

      Yes a specifically-designed and finely tuned ML program can now beat the best human chess player, but calling it “AI” and bundling it together with the latest Gemini or Claude iteration’s “reasoning capabilities” is intentionally misleading. That’s why articles like this one are needed. ML is a useful tool but far from the “super-human general intelligence” that is meant to replace half of human workers by the power of wishful prompting

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 天前

      I forgot which airline it is but one of the onboard games in the back of a headrest TV was a game called “Beginners Chess” which was notoriously difficult to beat so it was tested against other chess engines and it ranked in like the top five most powerful chess engines ever