• Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Holy crap. The obvious use for this would be in vitro. However, I cannot wait to see how this affects those already born. Could it be used on someone who is a 7 year old to rid them of this? What if they’re 50? So cool. Can’t wait to see where this goes.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The article mentions the technique worked on most (differentiated) skin cells they tested on, in addition to working on (undifferentiated) stem cells.

      But, there’s a lot of steps between this article and any sort of treatment, if I understand correctly.

      It might be easier to just edit the gametes before they form a zygote at all. That would also make consent for treatment much clearer.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Could it be used on someone who is a 7 year old to rid them of this?

      No. Gene editing works in this case since they’re just working with a few cells. But a whole human is way more cells. Not only that, but the cells have already developed into structures that are much harder to access, and difficult to change. Any gene therapy may only affect a few cells.

      On top of that, there’s also a bunch of ethical issues around altering a human when they’ve already formed, and we don’t really know if it would be possible to do so, or if it would make things worse.

    • moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hard to say at this point. This early testing was on cells in a petri dish. It will take a lot of study to convert this to a treatment on living humans and determine the best time to intervene.