Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds have apparently never met in person before, despite their pseudo-rivalry.

  • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Bill Gates is a monopoly capitalist with zero scruples. He screwed over so many people, vacuumed up so much wealth from all other sectors of the world economy. He has zero qualms about doing this either: There’s video of his depositions in the anti-trust case against Microsoft, and the whole fucking time he just argues semantics in response to the questions, and when pressed after five minutes of defining every fucking word in a sentence, almost always claims he doesn’t know or recall. Obviously a guy that thinks being as dishonest as it is possible to get away with is perfectly good business. And he does that despite whatever the outcome of the case, he’d be richer than billions of humans collectively. What pathology is this?

    There’s so much more shit, like the incessant lobbying for medical patents worldwide, or how, according to Melinda, Gates loved hanging out with Epstein.

    Now, why would anyone want to have their picture taken with that guy? Torvalds is such an unprincipled lib.

    Edit: Listened to some of the deposition in the background. Here Gates is being extremely annoying for example: The interviewer reads back an email from Gates saying something like “browser share is a very, very important goal for this company”, and then asks what other companies he’s comparing browser share with. Gates goes several minutes arguing he’s not talking about any other companies, since literally there are no other companies mentioned in that very sentence, obviously pretending like he doesn’t understand the question. If you listen to all the shit before, they have to go over whether “browser share” means “market share” (Gates says no), whether “very, very important” and “important” have different meanings (Gates says not necessarily, could be hyperbole), and that sort of stuff for minutes on end. Like seriously listen to this, I cannot even describe how stupid it is.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      The Conference at Redmond

      Well, they finally did it. Bill Gates, the Monopoly Warlord of Redmond, and Linus Torvalds, the caffeine-fueled architect of Linux rebellion, have shaken hands like two aging mob bosses who accidentally showed up to the same funeral. The image alone is enough to make a ThinkPad burst into flames. Gates, the man who once viewed free software the way a vampire views sunlight, now smiling alongside Torvalds, the supposed Patron Saint of Open Source, as if decades of digital trench warfare never happened. It’s like watching Che Guevara and Milton Friedman split a dessert sampler and talk cloud strategy.

      Mark Russinovich, playing the role of High Priest of Corporate Reconciliation, quipped “no major kernel decisions were made.” But let’s not kid ourselves, this wasn’t just dinner. This was a symbolic convergence, a ritual unification of cathedral and bazaar into a suburban steakhouse of existential despair. Somewhere in the void, the ghost of Richard Stallman is chain-smoking over a broken Emacs install, muttering, “I warned you bastards.” The only thing missing from that picture was a scroll of NDAs and a PowerPoint titled “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Surveillance Capitalism.”

      What we witnessed was not diplomacy, it was absorption. The rebel king has been invited into the palace, offered wine, and handed a commemorative hoodie with the Microsoft logo stitched in ethically-sourced irony. Forget forks and pull requests; this is the final merge. Linux has breached the 4% desktop market share, and capitalism has responded the only way it knows how: by smiling, shaking hands, and quietly buying the table. Welcome to the Conference at Redmond. Weep for the dream. Or laugh maniacally, if you still know how.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What else would you expect from the “dictator for life”, that he would have the social skills NOT to attend “Conference at Redmond” ?

  • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Genuinely kind of surprised they only met now, one would have thought that in over 30 years they would have run into each other at some point at some conference or other.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Both Torvalds and Gates are nerds… Gates decided to monetize it and Torvalds decided to give it away.

    But without Microsoft’s “PC on every desktop” vision for the '90s, we may not have seen such an increased demand for server infrastructure which is all running the Linux kernel now.

    Arguably Torvalds’ strategy had a greater impact than Gates because now many of us carry his kernel in our pocket. But I think both needed each other to get where we are today.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But without Microsoft’s “PC on every desktop” vision for the '90s, we may not have seen such an increased demand for server infrastructure which is all running the Linux kernel now.

      Debatable, in my opinion. There were lots of other companies trying to build personal computers back in those times (IBM being the most prominent). If Microsoft had never existed (or gone about things in a different way), things would have been different, no doubt, but they would still be very important and popular devices. The business-use aspect alone had a great draw and from there, I suspect that adoption at homes, schools, etc. would still follow in a very strong way.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I remember that IBM was famously missing the trend in the late 80s/90s and couldn’t understand why regular consumers would ever want to buy a PC. It’s why they gave the PC clone market away, never seriously approached their OS/2 thing, and never really marketed directly to anybody except businesses.

        Microsoft really pushed the idea that regular people needed a home PC which laid the foundation for so many people already having the hardware in place to jump on the internet as soon as it became accessible.

        For a brief moment it looked like a toss up between Microsoft IIS webservers serving up .asp files (or coldfusion .cf - RIP) vs Apache pushing CGI but in the end the Linux solution was more baked and flexible when it was time to launch and scale an internet startup in that era.

        Somebody else would have done what Microsoft did for sure, had they not been there, and I suppose we could be paying AT&T for Unix licenses these days too. But yeah, ultimately both Gates and Torvalds were right in terms of operating systems and well timed.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve said this before here, but techy people vastly overestimate both the ability and the patience of the typical user, and it’s the reason so few people use FOSS products.

      Products from big tech aimed at private individuals are designed to be as simple to use as possible, which is why they’re so popular.

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Linus looks old now 😭

    I guess that’s how time works but still…

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I hate to sound preachy, but this is a good example of “rivals” peacefully meeting.

    So many people I meet IRL seem conditioned to think this person they hate on the internet would be someone they’d shout at like they’re an axe murderer, in the middle of a murder. It’s the example they see. Death threats are, like, normal on Facebook or TV News or whatever they’re into, apparently.

    Again at risk of reaching… this feels like positive masculinity to me.

    And leaders acting like adults.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There’s Dave Cutler in the article. They both heard boss music and it wasn’t theirs.

      See, Dave Cutler’s level of “boss” for Unix would be Kirk McCusick or Bill Joy.

  • comador @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Bill announces a collaboration between the two, starting with an open source implementation of BOB and Clippy AI for Linux…

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    16 hours ago

    No major kernel decisions were made,” jokes Russinovich in a post on LinkedIn.

    Man, wouldn’t that be wild, though?

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Maybe I’m wrong, but isn’t Gates retired? And I have no idea if Torvalds is still active.

    But historical photo aside, isn’t this meeting a bunch of nothing?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Torvalds is still very active on the Linux kernel. As far as I know, he’s in charge of it and makes major decisions about its direction.

      Bill Gates retired from Microsoft in 2008.

      • PacMan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Linus still approves the changes in the kernel. His main baby for the past 15 years or so has been GIT.

        • offspec@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I think he maintained git at its inception for like 6 months and then passed it off to someone else, but I could be completely mistaken.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        That means there are highschool seniors who weren’t even alive while Bill Gates was at Microsoft. Interns might not even know who he is.

    • chrash0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 hours ago

      without checking, Gates’ wealth is probably tied up in a lot of MS stock, and he could probably walk into the office and ask the intern to get him a coffee. but yeah i think mostly retired.

      Linus is still active is maintaining the Linux kernel.

      and yes, this is fluff, not some kind of summit