• YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Eventually you’ll reach a stopping point. The believers go a step behind the nonbelievers, a step into the unseen, that’s all. Up until the beginning of the universe we’re all in agreement because things exist, lol. And there’s no contradiction in the definitions I’m using, that’s just semantics and often due to the Frankenstein monster of inconsistencies that’s Roman Catholicism and everything that came from it. You have to think about it without labels, the way the Greek philosophers did, and assume corruption in much of the remaining scriptures. And blood sacrifices? Are you referring to Abraham? God doesn’t require blood, just faith and acts, we’re not Aztecs! But if you believe in the unseen and in a judgment post death, you believe in life after death, and if you do and God Himself asks you to sacrifice your child, is it even a negative or are you, with 100% certainty, sending your kid to Heaven? Not that it’s an easy pill to swallow, there’s a reason Abraham’s name is known today, but that’s not because BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD, but it fits as an acknowledgement of our ephemeral nature and ‘meaningless existence’ and a test of faith (everyone dies in the end too…).

    If you ever wanna talk about it in earnest, I’m up for a call. These convos are not very productive in this format, lol.

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yup, eventually believers reach the same stopping point but instead of saying “I don’t know” they go “God did it”, until science explains how that happened, so believers go to the next thing and say “well I don’t know how this happened, therefore God”. That is called “the God of the gaps” and it’s a terrible argument, it’s okay to admit we don’t know something.

      And no, I’m not talking about Abraham, I’m talking about Jesus, the whole reason why Jesus is crucified is so that his blood can clean the sin of mankind. The basics of Christianism are the following tenets:

      1. God can’t (or doesn’t want to) coexist with Sin
      2. God requires blood sacrifices, usually animals, to purify Sin
      3. God offered a loophole, by sacrificing an innocent person anyone can point at that sacrifice and say “I’m using this sacrifice to purify my sins”.
      4. Because there are no Sinless humans he had to come down in human form to sacrifice himself so that he could charge the innocent blood price for the Sins of mankind

      Otherwise why would God need to offer himself as sacrifice to purify sins? Couldn’t he just say “all sins are gone”? However you look at it he asks for a blood sacrifice, however he allows you to cash in his own blood sacrifice in its place, and if you don’t he sends you to Hell, very loving fellow.

      • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I understand the concept of the “God of the gaps” but this is not about that. Our origins before the start of the universe is not something we can ever study or know anything about! Of course it’s a ‘gap in our knowledge’, but it’s a fundamental one, not one that can ever be filled. You make a decision to be on one of two camps: “things exist” or “things exist, and that implies a Creator”. That’s all. And like I said, I don’t think there’s a ‘final irrefutable argument’ after that to make anyone believe in the Creator. It’s just a personal decision.

        And I don’t believe in Christianity, it’s a mixture of European paganism (including the winter’s solstice now called Christmas) and some Abrahamic/Mosaic superficial aspects and tenets besides the most important one: don’t equate anything/one to God. God is no man. I mean, if you’ve read the Bible (heavily ‘corrupted’, but the whole Roman Catholic religion was based in corruption and the co opting of a ‘Jewish’ religion movement), you’ll see that Jesus doesn’t even want you to call him ‘good’ (let alone God!), telling us that “only the Father is good”. Disregard everything you know about God that comes from whatever Western understanding you have of Him. Disregard anything Paulian (the actual founding figure of Christianity, and to a great extent why it’s a fucked up thing). If you’re really interested: read Ecclesiastes, read at least the Sermon of the Mount, read the Qur’an and make your own conclusions. The wise and inspired said all the same things in the end (“fear God and keep His commandments”, “Love your enemies. Bless those who curse you. Do good to those who hate you. And pray for those who hurt you and persecute you, so that you may be the children of your Father, Who is in Heaven.”…) just with different accents. Nothing that’s nonsensical belongs to God’s system nor are they words inspired by Him!