Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1539arrow-down113
arrow-up1526arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squarelepinkainen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down5·1 day agoWrong 70% doing what? I’ve used LLMs as a Stack Overflow / MSDN replacement for over a year and if they fucked up 7/10 questions I’d stop. Same with code, any free model can easily generate simple scripts and utilities with maybe 10% error rate, definitely not 70%
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 hours agoDefinitely at image generation. Getting what you want with that is an exercise in patience for sure.
minus-squareCodeBlooded@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·23 hours agoI’m far more efficient with AI tools as a programmer. I love it! 🤷♂️
Wrong 70% doing what?
I’ve used LLMs as a Stack Overflow / MSDN replacement for over a year and if they fucked up 7/10 questions I’d stop.
Same with code, any free model can easily generate simple scripts and utilities with maybe 10% error rate, definitely not 70%
Definitely at image generation. Getting what you want with that is an exercise in patience for sure.
I’m far more efficient with AI tools as a programmer. I love it! 🤷♂️