The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoEight beavers in the Czech Republic did some public service.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1670arrow-down111file-text
arrow-up1659arrow-down1imageEight beavers in the Czech Republic did some public service.lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square47fedilinkfile-text
This was earlier this year. Link: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/beaver-dam-czech-republic
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·8 days ago These eager beavers saved the Czech government $1.2 million Do we really think that a beaver dam is the same level of safety/long term investment as a $1.2 million dam? I get that they’re trying to be clever or whatever with this headline, but it just comes off as more low-key “government can’t work” propaganda.
minus-squareWoodScientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 days ago Do we really think that a beaver dam is the same level of safety/long term investment as a $1.2 million dam? I mean, the dam is self-repairing.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 days agoSo you would be willing to build a home in a flood zone that is protected by nothing but a “dam” built by beavers? The structures may share a name, but believe it or not, humans have innovated quite a bit to say the fucking least…
minus-squareWoodScientist@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoWe’ll build the homes in the flood zone, but only let beavers live there.
minus-squareDerpgon@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 days agoSafety? In the wild? I mean, a beaver dam doesn’t need safety features because a sane person doesn’t expect it to be safe to interact with a beaver dam. Longevity, not sure, but at least it can be replaced by humans if it breaks at a later date.
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-28 days agoLook at the comments in this thread. From a literal engineer… It’s fucking dumb
minus-squareDerpgon@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 days agoWhat’s dumb? A beaver dam, anti-beaver propaganda, or anti-government propaganda?
Do we really think that a beaver dam is the same level of safety/long term investment as a $1.2 million dam?
I get that they’re trying to be clever or whatever with this headline, but it just comes off as more low-key “government can’t work” propaganda.
I mean, the dam is self-repairing.
So you would be willing to build a home in a flood zone that is protected by nothing but a “dam” built by beavers?
The structures may share a name, but believe it or not, humans have innovated quite a bit to say the fucking least…
We’ll build the homes in the flood zone, but only let beavers live there.
Safety? In the wild? I mean, a beaver dam doesn’t need safety features because a sane person doesn’t expect it to be safe to interact with a beaver dam.
Longevity, not sure, but at least it can be replaced by humans if it breaks at a later date.
Look at the comments in this thread. From a literal engineer… It’s fucking dumb
What’s dumb? A beaver dam, anti-beaver propaganda, or anti-government propaganda?