Tesla was caught withholding data, lying about it, and misdirecting authorities in the wrongful death case involving Autopilot that it lost this week.

The automaker was undeniably covering up for Autopilot.

Last week, a jury found Tesla partially liable for a wrongful death involving a crash on Autopilot. We now have access to the trial transcripts, which confirm that Tesla was extremely misleading in its attempt to place all the blame on the driver.

The company went as far as to actively withhold critical evidence that explained Autopilot’s performance around the crash. Within about three minutes of the crash, the Model S uploaded a “collision snapshot”—video, CAN‑bus streams, EDR data, etc.—to Tesla’s servers, the “Mothership”, and received an acknowledgement. The vehicle then deleted its local copy, resulting in Tesla being the only entity having access.

What ensued were years of battle to get Tesla to acknowledge that this collision snapshot exists and is relevant to the case.

The police repeatedly attempted to obtain the data from the collision snapshot, but Tesla led the authorities and the plaintiffs on a lengthy journey of deception and misdirection that spanned years.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    26 days ago

    Within about three minutes of the crash, the Model S uploaded a “collision snapshot”—video, CAN‑bus streams, EDR data, etc.—to Tesla’s servers, the “Mothership”, and received an acknowledgement. The vehicle then deleted its local copy, resulting in Tesla being the only entity having access.

    Holy fucking shit. What is the purpose of deleting the data on the vehicle other than to sabotage the owner of the vehicle?

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      That jumped out at me too. Giving the benefit of the doubt, it could be that this “snapshot” includes a very large amount of data that could be problematic if stored locally for longer. In reality, they probably do it this way for exactly this type of situation, so they can retain full control of the potentially-damning data.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          26 days ago

          Nearly all of the vehicles have 4G/5G connectivity via AT&T. This isn’t a dial up connection. They can transmit whatever the fuck they want.

          • amorpheus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Still, if it’s small enough to transmit via any wireless connection they can easily keep the local copy.

          • Eheran@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            25 days ago

            Mate, a 1 TB micro SD costs less than 100 $. How much does a high bandwidth high/no data limit 5G connection cost and how long would that need to actually transmit that much?

            What sensor data is there even supposed to be? Even at 1 millisecond resolution we are talking about megabytes.

    • Shanedino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      26 days ago

      It is possible that the data is just never saved in non-volatile memory meaning that once power is lost that the values are also lost. In which case its not really deleting the information but rather just that information is just never intentionally saved.

      P.S. I am not a tesla fan boy just wanted to give this tiny insight.

        • kjetil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          Didnt the article say they retrieved the filename and hash, thus proving the existence of the crash diagnostic snapshot. After which Tesla handed over their copy?

          Or did the forensics retrieve the actual data?

          Edit: Given the importance of this type of data, not saving it to non-voletile memory is negligent at best. Even if it required a huge amount of space, they could delete unimportant files like the Spotify cache or apps or whatever

          • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            25 days ago

            The article kind of fumbles the wording and creates confusion. There are, however, some passages that indicate to me that the actual data was recovered. All of the following are taking about the NAND flash memory.

            The engineers quickly found that all the data was there despite Tesla’s previous claims.

            Now, the plaintiffs had access to everything.

            Moore was astonished by all the data found through cloning the Autopilot ECU:

            “For an engineer like me, the data out of those computers was a treasure‑trove of how this crash happened.”

            On top of all the data being so much more helpful, Moore found unallocated space and metadata for snapshot_collision_airbag‑deployment.tar’, including its SHA‑1 checksum and the exact server path.

            It seems that maybe the .tar file itself was not recovered, but all the data about the crash was still there.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        This explanation is completely fabricated, based on nothing, and nonsense.

        It is obviously critical data that nobody halfway competent would write to ram. Also video data is very large and makes no sense to store in ram.

        Furthermore the article says it was deleted and they later recovered it which would not have been possible with RAM

        Basically why are you pushing this drivel.

        • Shanedino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          25 days ago

          If the data is temporarily stored until it is transmitted and then is not considered to be needed anymore I see no reason as to why that would need to be stored locally forever.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            Because it may not be possible to transmit depending on location. Also non violtile storage is cheap and fast and ram is normally limited

            • Shanedino@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              On embedded controllers you are usually heavily limited with nonvolatile memory.

              • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 days ago

                Not sure why you think this, it’s generally trivial to add non-volatile storage to microcontrollers, and much more complicated to add external RAM.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            Perhaps most importantly although we know it was not so lost because we read the article or at least the summary if it had been it would have been a deliberate design decision to have it be so.

            Your explanation doesn’t wash in reality but it also doesn’t wash even in theory.

            • Shanedino@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 days ago

              You’re also making assumptions in that the volatile memory lost power and thus must have been cleared at some point. I dont think there is a right or a wrong based on the knowledge i have I just am throwing out a random guess.

              • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                25 days ago

                The article says Tesla deletes it and was forced to produce it. Seems pretty obvious that your theory is wrong

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yeah, this is a good point. Also, another comment said it’s possible the data snapshot is very large, so it’s not intended to be stored locally.

        Either way, if you are sending data about my car to a server, it better be easy for me to get this data if needed.

        • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          25 days ago

          Don’t these keep a video record of every time a squirrel gets too close to the parked car?

          Another m.2 under the dash isn’t going to kill the electric vehicles battery, this isn’t an excuse.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            25 days ago

            Don’t these keep a video record

            those are saved on external drives. That being said, they could also have it set to save something like this to the external storage if it was too large for the internal memory as well.

            Videos aren’t saved without the external drive.

  • BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Folks. Publicly traded companies will ALWAYS compare the expected value of breaking the law with compliance.

    Say it costs $100 million to follow the law. Breaking it comes with a $300 million fine, but only a 20% chance of getting caught.

    They compare a 100% chance of paying $100 million to a 20% chance of paying $300 million.

    Average cost of following the law: $100 million

    Average cost of breaking it: $60 million

    If we’re gonna do capitalism (which I would rather we not, for the record!), we have to make that expected value calculation break in favor of following regulations. If it is cheaper to break the law than to follow it, you’re not just losing money by complying: you’re giving ground to your competition. Fines need to be massive. Infractions need to get caught and punished. Executives need to be held personally accountable. Corporations need to be dissolved. Fines cannot be just the cost of doing business.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      26 days ago

      The conditioning of people to think it must be monetary fines is strong I guess. Imo it shouldn’t be a fine for intentionally breaking laws, especially when putting lives in danger. It should be jail time for the executives. Make the calculation disappear altogether.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      26 days ago

      I’d raise you in that. Companies are people now. If companies break laws, they should be held accountable personally. Even Club Fed would be misery for 14 years on a murder rap.

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I swear I’m not a tesla fan boy but I’m going to sit here and pull baseless excuses out of my ass for two paragraphs in order to defend this terrible company headed by a literal nazi.

    — this entire fucking comment section

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    26 days ago

    Isn’t this how murderers act? This sounds like they “accidentally” (collateral damage) killed people and then are trying to cover it up.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    26 days ago

    Is this the one where the car crashes after Autopilot turns off? Where Tesla tries to claim that the driver floored it after it turned off?

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      No, in this case autopilot never disengaged (but according to the article, it should have issued the warning and disengaged earlier)

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    a company doing unethical immoral things, purgery and lying to officials? thats been done a billion times already. Elon is no different then any other scum bag who runs the world.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    Another reason why Leon Hitler and Krasnov shut down the NTSB office that was investigating their shitty Autopilot system.