• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Man, they’re twisting the data hard to try to make China look good here. They’re falling back on per capita, and cumulative to try to hide that they’re the largest emitter of carbon by far, much of it is from burning coal, which they are still doing much more than any other country.

    This is greenwashing, nothing more.

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe… but… remember ten years ago when there were all those articles about how “China is building train stations to no-where!” and today those same train stations are now in the center of new bustling cities? Isn’t this what we’d expect to see, right at the start of a pivot to green energy?

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        bustling…cities?

        not what I’ve seen. I’ve seen entire 30 floor buildings empty.

        just because there is a “city” doesn’t mean it’s populated.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If you observe snapshots in time you’d understand what the facts are at that point in time. If you observe the trends at a point in time, you’d understand what things are likely to look at a future point in time. To me the interesting and informative bit is the trend and its short and long term projections. E.g. that it points to peak oil consumption within a couple of years and that it points to reduction of the leverage of OPEC and the US over China along any downstream effects.