I tried self hosting it,but it felt very resource intensive on my vps. It’s a really good bookmark manager, feature rich and all. But I feel like it could have been lighter.

  • BinaryUnit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Before I started to host a bookmark service i made some investigation, and the final dockerized contenders in 2023 for what relates to memory were:

    Shaarli: (~ 50Mb of RAM )

    Shiori: ( ~30Mb of RAM but lacks quite some features)

    linkding ( ~200Mb of RAM)

    In the end i went with Shaarli

  • VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Linkwarden has pretty minimal hardware requirements - it was tested on a VPS with 4gb of memory and it ran pretty smoothly, the most intense part is when you build the app, but once it’s running it’s relatively lightweight.

    From their website. I wouldn’t consider tested on 4gb vps having minimal hardware.

    I use Linkding and I am very happy with it. Less feature? Maybe. But it’s a bookmark sync. What do you need?

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you just want to sync bookmarks I don’t think linkwarden is what you want. Maybe floccus? I’m going to check out linkding that someone else mentioned because using git to sync floccus is broken on mobile platforms.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s intensive because its trying to archive the links and spends a lot of ram doing so.

    It’s more like a replacement for pocket.