“Trust” as in: trust it enough to run it on your machine.

(And assuming that you can’t understand code yourself)

  • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    While I am… suspicious of what the CEO (?) has spouted recently, I am unaware of how that connects to user data. Can you ELI5/summarize/point me in a direction?

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      That was largely gut-level analysis for my personal decision-making but here are a few of the things I considered:

      1. Value proposition in the context of acquisition, featuring a heavily-marketed privacy brand and a base of privacy-conscious users (harder to profile, more expensive data)
      2. Obfuscation of funding sources via ‘venture philanthropy’ non-profit (a la OpenAI) housing closed-doors for-profit operations
      3. Rapid expansion to full-coverage consumer productivity cloud platform alternatives (vpn, mail, drive, calendar, wallet, passwords, etc)
      4. Weird pattern of being blocked then let through without future contest by numerous data-hungry entities including thiel, and generally just allowed in a few too many privacy-unfriendly places for my taste
      5. And the usual reservations re: privatized privacy and commercial OSS

      Again sorry that’s all hand-wavy. Probably shouldn’t have thrown shade without something more concrete.