• xodoh74984@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Personally, I always felt it was an impractical thought experiment you’d have in high school physics class after a lesson on friction and not much more. It was a great way to derail (heh) legitimate conversations about California building a realistic and cost effective high speed rail when it was first proposed.

      Side note: Nitter still exists?! I thought they gave up

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      Why build a dangerous underground railroad for cars when you can just build safe regular high speed rail? Oh right, one discourages the overproduction and overuse of personal vehicles.

  • embed_me@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Sad to see my nation waste resources on this short-sighted impractical solution

    Especially since the public infrastructure has always been in a state of much needed planning and resources