Lawmakers in the state of Michigan introduced legislation last week that would adopt a total ban on pornography within the state. All of the proponents of the bill are anti-porn Republicans who liken legal porn to human trafficking and criminal conduct.
“Pornographic material” includes any content, digital,
streamed, or otherwise distributed on the internet, the primary purpose of which is to sexually arouse or gratify, including
videos, erotica, magazines, stories, manga, material generated by
artificial intelligence, live feeds, or sound clips.
Soooo they want stronger plot lines in their porn? Is that what I’m hearing? Something that they can sit down and watch with the family?
In case it wasn’t clear to everyone, the end goal here is not banning porn, but to classify being gay, trans, etc, as sexually arousing and ban any speech by anyone in those groups, followed by banning those groups.
You seem to be mistaken, sir: the primary purpose of this content is to promote dialogue on the meaning of interpersonal relations and the growth of human experience.
Maybe you just don’t have a good grasp on art studies.
From the bill:
Soooo they want stronger plot lines in their porn? Is that what I’m hearing? Something that they can sit down and watch with the family?
In case it wasn’t clear to everyone, the end goal here is not banning porn, but to classify being gay, trans, etc, as sexually arousing and ban any speech by anyone in those groups, followed by banning those groups.
You seem to be mistaken, sir: the primary purpose of this content is to promote dialogue on the meaning of interpersonal relations and the growth of human experience.
Maybe you just don’t have a good grasp on art studies.
I thought that’s what softcore porn is for.